Hi Ajay -

If you're asking about the global attribute standard_name_vocabulary, it isn't actually part of CF, it's part of the data discovery attributes convention(ACDD),
so I'm not sure if this list is the best place to ask about this field.

The ACDD project is now being supported by ESIP; the page describing it is at
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Category:Attribute_Conventions_Dataset_Discovery
Questions about it can be sent to the esip-documentation email list, at
http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-documentation

As far as I know, the only group that has implemented ACDD extensively is at NODC; they've published templates and examples that use it. On their site, at
https://geo-ide.noaa.gov/wiki/index.php?title=NODC_NetCDF_Templates, it
says:

'Since these templates comply with CF conventions, this attribute should contain "CF-1.6". '

On the ESIP site, there's a 'working version' where proposals are under discussion for the next rev of the convention. On that page, there's a different syntax being proposed ' "CF:NetCDF COARDS Climate and Forecast Standard Names"' - however that hasn't actually been discussed yet. Personally I prefer the NODC version, but I think this field is redundant; if the 'conventions' attribute contains CF, then the standard names are from CF, as far as I
can see.

Cheers - Nan



On 6/14/13 8:53 AM, Jim Biard wrote:
Ajay,

As best as I understand, the standard_name_vocabulary attribute should contain the name and version of the actual standard name table - most likely the one current to when you designed the file contents. It should be something along the lines of

CF Standard Name Table (v16, 11 October 2010)

Grace and peace,

Jim


On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello Roy,

Thanks for that bit of information. So is it safe to leave out the version number till the issues with the reference to multiple URI's have been sorted out?

Thanks,
Ajay


    Message: 2
    Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:44:25 -0400
    From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
    Message-ID:
<caa9eys49d1bzgpqe5dcxtd9gzenkx9aumfjzqbit_ulml7e...@mail.gmail.com
    <mailto:caa9eys49d1bzgpqe5dcxtd9gzenkx9aumfjzqbit_ulml7e...@mail.gmail.com>>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

    Hi,

    There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the
    standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the
    right
    value would be to use something like CF 1.6
    
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute

    Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the
    cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?

    Any info on this would be much appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Ajay
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL:
    
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/2313776c/attachment-0001.html>

    ------------------------------

    Message: 3
    Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:50:04 +0100
    From: "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>,
            "[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
    Message-ID:
<40829b0e077c1145a6de44d39b3830a922c46dc...@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk
    <mailto:40829b0e077c1145a6de44d39b3830a922c46dc...@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk>>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

    Hello Ajay,

    If I've got it right, your example is a URL for a single standard
    name.  The version numbers refer to versions of the whole list
    and so including the version number in a reference to a single
    standard name causes the standard name to inherit the version
    number of the list of which it is a member.  Trouble is that most
    standard names are members of more than one list version but the
    standard name is exactly the same in each of these versions.
     Consequently, a given standard name ends up with multiple URIs.
     In version 1 of the vocabulary server we run (NERC Vocabulary
    Server or NVS) we made the mistake of list members inheriting the
    version numbers of their parent lists and learned the hard way
    the problems it causes for operational systems.  Versioning in
    the current version of NVS (V2)has been done differently with
    list member and list versioning totally decoupled and the
    versioning information explicitly excluded from list member URIs.

    I am aware of work underway by Mark Hedley at the UK Met Office
    to provide URLs for Standard Names in a CF namespace that follow
    linked data principles by resolving into usable XML (SKOS RDF)
    documents.  I'm not sure how far this work has progressed, so
    I'll leave it Mark to say more on the list if he feels he's ready.

    Cheers, Roy.

    ________________________________
    From: CF-metadata [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Ajay
    Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>]
    Sent: 13 June 2013 13:44
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute


    Hi,

    There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the
    standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the
    right value would be to use something like CF 1.6
    
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute

    Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the
    cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?

    Any info on this would be much appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Ajay

    ________________________________
    ________________________________
    From: CF-metadata [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of Lowry,
    Roy K. [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
    Sent: 13 June 2013 14:50
    To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute

    Hello Ajay,

    If I've got it right, your example is a URL for a single standard
    name.  The version numbers refer to versions of the whole list
    and so including the version number in a reference to a single
    standard name causes the standard name to inherit the version
    number of the list of which it is a member.  Trouble is that most
    standard names are members of more than one list version but the
    standard name is exactly the same in each of these versions.
     Consequently, a given standard name ends up with multiple URIs.
     In version 1 of the vocabulary server we run (NERC Vocabulary
    Server or NVS) we made the mistake of list members inheriting the
    version numbers of their parent lists and learned the hard way
    the problems it causes for operational systems.  Versioning in
    the current version of NVS (V2)has been done differently with
    list member and list versioning totally decoupled and the
    versioning information explicitly excluded from list member URIs.

    I am aware of work underway by Mark Hedley at the UK Met Office
    to provide URLs for Standard Names in a CF namespace that follow
    linked data principles by resolving into usable XML (SKOS RDF)
    documents.  I'm not sure how far this work has progressed, so
    I'll leave it Mark to say more on the list if he feels he's ready.

    Cheers, Roy.



    ________________________________
    From: CF-metadata [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of Ajay
    Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>]
    Sent: 13 June 2013 13:44
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute


    Hi,

    There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the
    standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the
    right value would be to use something like CF 1.6
    
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute

    Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the
    cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?

    Any info on this would be much appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Ajay
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL:
    
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/443c998e/attachment.html>
    -------------- next part --------------
    A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    Name: publishingStandardNames.pdf
    Type: application/pdf
    Size: 63930 bytes
    Desc: publishingStandardNames.pdf
    URL:
    
<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/443c998e/attachment.pdf>_______________________________________________
    CF-metadata mailing list [email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


--
*******************************************************
* Nan Galbraith        Information Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group            Mail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution                *
* Woods Hole, MA 02543                 (508) 289-2444 *
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to