Thank you all very much!
-Ajay

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send CF-metadata mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CF-metadata digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: standard_name_vocabulary attribute (Jim Biard)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:53:59 -0400
> From: Jim Biard <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected] List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> We are making use of the ACDD here at NCDC.  We are referencing the
> standard name table that was current at the time the standard name
> attribute values were specified for the file.  I agree that referencing a
> version of CF is both incomplete and redundant.
>
> Jim Biard
> Research Scholar
> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites
> Remote Sensing and Applications Division
> National Climatic Data Center
> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801-5001
>
> [email protected]
> 828-271-4900
>
>
>
> Follow us on Facebook!
>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Nan Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ajay -
> >
> > If you're asking about the global attribute standard_name_vocabulary, it
> isn't
> > actually part of CF, it's part of the data discovery attributes
> convention(ACDD),
> > so I'm not sure if this list is the best place to ask about this field.
> >
> > The ACDD project is now being supported by ESIP; the page describing it
> is at
> >
> http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Category:Attribute_Conventions_Dataset_Discovery
> > Questions about it can be sent to the esip-documentation email list, at
> > http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-documentation
> >
> > As far as I know, the only group that has implemented ACDD extensively
> is at
> > NODC; they've published templates and examples that use it.  On their
> site, at
> > https://geo-ide.noaa.gov/wiki/index.php?title=NODC_NetCDF_Templates,  it
> > says:
> >
> > 'Since these templates comply with CF conventions, this attribute should
> contain "CF-1.6". '
> >
> > On the ESIP site, there's a 'working version' where proposals are under
> discussion for
> > the next rev of the convention. On that page, there's a different syntax
> being proposed
> > ' "CF:NetCDF COARDS Climate and Forecast Standard Names"' - however that
> hasn't actually
> > been discussed yet.  Personally I prefer the NODC version, but I think
> this field is redundant;
> > if the 'conventions' attribute contains CF, then the standard names are
> from CF, as far as I
> > can see.
> >
> > Cheers - Nan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/14/13 8:53 AM, Jim Biard wrote:
> >> Ajay,
> >>
> >> As best as I understand, the standard_name_vocabulary attribute should
> contain the name and version of the actual standard name table - most
> likely the one current to when you designed the file contents.  It should
> be something along the lines of
> >>
> >> CF Standard Name Table (v16, 11 October 2010)
> >>
> >> Grace and peace,
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Roy,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for that bit of information. So is it safe to leave out the
> version number till the issues with the reference to multiple URI's have
> been sorted out?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ajay
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Message: 2
> >>> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:44:25 -0400
> >>> From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected]>
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>>         <
> caa9eys49d1bzgpqe5dcxtd9gzenkx9aumfjzqbit_ulml7e...@mail.gmail.com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the
> >>> standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the right
> >>> value would be to use something like CF 1.6
> >>>
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute
> >>>
> >>> Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the
> >>> cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?
> >>>
> >>> Any info on this would be much appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ajay
> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >>> URL: <
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/2313776c/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 3
> >>> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:50:04 +0100
> >>> From: "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]>
> >>> To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected]>,
> >>>         "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>>         <
> 40829b0e077c1145a6de44d39b3830a922c46dc...@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>>
> >>> Hello Ajay,
> >>>
> >>> If I've got it right, your example is a URL for a single standard
> name.  The version numbers refer to versions of the whole list and so
> including the version number in a reference to a single standard name
> causes the standard name to inherit the version number of the list of which
> it is a member.  Trouble is that most standard names are members of more
> than one list version but the standard name is exactly the same in each of
> these versions.  Consequently, a given standard name ends up with multiple
> URIs.  In version 1 of the vocabulary server we run (NERC Vocabulary Server
> or NVS) we made the mistake of list members inheriting the version numbers
> of their parent lists and learned the hard way the problems it causes for
> operational systems.  Versioning in the current version of NVS (V2)has been
> done differently with list member and list versioning totally decoupled and
> the versioning information explicitly excluded from list member URIs.
> >>>
> >>> I am aware of work underway by Mark Hedley at the UK Met Office to
> provide URLs for Standard Names in a CF namespace that follow linked data
> principles by resolving into usable XML (SKOS RDF) documents.  I'm not sure
> how far this work has progressed, so I'll leave it Mark to say more on the
> list if he feels he's ready.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers, Roy.
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: 13 June 2013 13:44
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the
> standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the right
> value would be to use something like CF 1.6
> >>>
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute
> >>>
> >>> Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the
> cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?
> >>>
> >>> Any info on this would be much appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ajay
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] on behalf of
> Lowry, Roy K. [[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: 13 June 2013 14:50
> >>> To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> >>>
> >>> Hello Ajay,
> >>>
> >>> If I've got it right, your example is a URL for a single standard
> name.  The version numbers refer to versions of the whole list and so
> including the version number in a reference to a single standard name
> causes the standard name to inherit the version number of the list of which
> it is a member.  Trouble is that most standard names are members of more
> than one list version but the standard name is exactly the same in each of
> these versions.  Consequently, a given standard name ends up with multiple
> URIs.  In version 1 of the vocabulary server we run (NERC Vocabulary Server
> or NVS) we made the mistake of list members inheriting the version numbers
> of their parent lists and learned the hard way the problems it causes for
> operational systems.  Versioning in the current version of NVS (V2)has been
> done differently with list member and list versioning totally decoupled and
> the versioning information explicitly excluded from list member URIs.
> >>>
> >>> I am aware of work underway by Mark Hedley at the UK Met Office to
> provide URLs for Standard Names in a CF namespace that follow linked data
> principles by resolving into usable XML (SKOS RDF) documents.  I'm not sure
> how far this work has progressed, so I'll leave it Mark to say more on the
> list if he feels he's ready.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers, Roy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] on behalf of
> Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: 13 June 2013 13:44
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the
> standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the right
> value would be to use something like CF 1.6
> >>>
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute
> >>>
> >>> Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the
> cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?
> >>>
> >>> Any info on this would be much appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ajay
> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >>> URL: <
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/443c998e/attachment.html
> >
> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >>> Name: publishingStandardNames.pdf
> >>> Type: application/pdf
> >>> Size: 63930 bytes
> >>> Desc: publishingStandardNames.pdf
> >>> URL: <
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130613/443c998e/attachment.pdf>_______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> >
> >
> > --
> > *******************************************************
> > * Nan Galbraith        Information Systems Specialist *
> > * Upper Ocean Processes Group            Mail Stop 29 *
> > * Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution                *
> > * Woods Hole, MA 02543                 (508) 289-2444 *
> > *******************************************************
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130614/bbd08426/attachment.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: CicsLogoTiny.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 15784 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130614/bbd08426/attachment.png
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CF-metadata Digest, Vol 122, Issue 36
> ********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to