Good day.

As a data producer I am seeking a resolution on the use of units="1" for 
dimensionless quantities.

Page 10 of CF Metadata Conventions version 1.6 states:

"Units are not required for dimensionless quantities. A variable with no units 
attribute is assumed to be dimensionless.  However, a units attribute 
specifying a dimensionless unit may optionally be included. The Udunits package 
defines a few dimensionless units, such as percent, but is lacking commonly 
used units such as ppm (parts per million). This convention does not support 
the addition of new dimensionless units that are not udunits compatible. The 
conforming unit for quantities that represent fractions, or parts of a whole, 
is "1"."

This clearly states that units="1" should be used for fractions or parts of a 
whole.  

However, in the standard name table, units="1" is used for dimensionless 
quantities that are not fractions.
See for example, land_binary_mask or sea_ice_classification.  Is units="1" 
valid for dimensionless quantities that are not fractions? Or is units="1" 
simply used as the default for all standard names that are dimensionless?  

What units if any should be used for a variable named "number_of_cloud_pixels" 
in a dataset containing a satellite image of the earth?

Thank you.


Michael Carlomusto
[email protected]
Harris Corp.
GOES-R Ground System
Melbourne, FL, USA
+1-321-309-7905



_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to