Hello and thank you for asking! For adding new names, we request that you provide the proposed standard name, the definition, and the canonical units for each name to be added. This will help us be sure the names are appropriate and do not duplicate concepts already in the list.
These names seem to correspond most closely to atmosphere_kinetic_energy_content and atmosphere_relative_vorticity, so those entries may provide helpful templates in preparing your request. John On Jun 4, 2014, at 13:24, Napoleon Cornejo <[email protected]> wrote: > Good day, > > We are currently developing software for the GOCE mission, called GUT: > > https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/software-tools/gut/about-gut/overview > > In the processing and output of data we want to adhere to the CF conventions > and therefore try to use the standard names approved. However, for some > quantities, particularly in oceanography, we cannot find appropriate names in > the standard name list. Specifically, for the following quantities: > > Ocean Kinetic Energy > Ocean Relative Vorticity (vertical component) > > We would like to suggest the names ocean_kinetic_energy and > ocean_relative_vorticity to handle these outputs and therefore we kindly > request your feedback. > > With kind regards, > > N.E. Cornejo _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
