Yes, it was. There was a set of responses sent to the list -- if you haven't subscribed to the list (strongly encouraged!), you can visit the mailing list archives to see the responses. Here's a link to a threaded view of this year's posts, http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2014/thread.html and here is your first post: http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2014/057492.html
John On Dec 8, 2014, at 06:51, Napoleon Cornejo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > Was this information what was required? > Please let me know if there is anything missing for the inclusion of these > quantities. > > Kind regards, > > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 14:34 +0100, Napoleon Cornejo wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> Sorry for the long delay. >> >> The names we are suggesting, with definition and units, are the following: >> >> Ocean Kinetic Energy >> standard name: ocean_kinetic_energy >> unit: m2 s-2 >> definition: ocean kinetic energy is the energy of the ocean currents as >> measured by their eastward/northward velocity. >> >> Ocean Relative Vorticy >> standard name: ocean_relative_vorticity >> unit: s-1 >> definition: relative vorticity is the upward component of the relative >> vorticity vector i.e. the component which arises from horizontal velocity. >> >> Gravity Potential Gradient >> standard name: gravity_potential_gradient >> unit: s-2 >> definition: gravitational potential gradient is defined as the rate of >> change of gravitational potential with distance in the field. >> >> Radius from Geocenter >> standard_name: radius_from_geocenter >> unit: m >> definition: a measure of distance from Earth's geocenter, commonly used in >> the satellite tracks. >> >> Let me know if you need more information. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 17:33 -0700, John Graybeal wrote: >>> >>> Hello and thank you for asking! >>> >>> For adding new names, we request that you provide the proposed standard >>> name, the definition, and the canonical units for each name to be added. >>> This will help us be sure the names are appropriate and do not duplicate >>> concepts already in the list. >>> >>> These names seem to correspond most closely to >>> atmosphere_kinetic_energy_content and atmosphere_relative_vorticity, so >>> those entries may provide helpful templates in preparing your request. >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2014, at 13:24, Napoleon Cornejo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Good day, >>> > >>> > We are currently developing software for the GOCE mission, called GUT: >>> > >>> > https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/software-tools/gut/about-gut/overview >>> > >>> > In the processing and output of data we want to adhere to the CF >>> > conventions and therefore try to use the standard names approved. >>> > However, for some quantities, particularly in oceanography, we cannot >>> > find appropriate names in the standard name list. Specifically, for the >>> > following quantities: >>> > >>> > Ocean Kinetic Energy >>> > Ocean Relative Vorticity (vertical component) >>> > >>> > We would like to suggest the names ocean_kinetic_energy and >>> > ocean_relative_vorticity to handle these outputs and therefore we kindly >>> > request your feedback. >>> > >>> > With kind regards, >>> > >>> > N.E. Cornejo _______________________________________________ >>> > CF-metadata mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>> >> >> >> > > -- > N.E. Cornejo, Msc. > Engineering, Space & Science > http://www.stcorp.nl > s[&]t > >
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
