On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Signell, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Back in mid-March we had a long discussion on this topic, initiated > when Richard Hattersley presented a model of what CF could look like > on github using restructured text and github style versioning. His > mock-up is still at > https://cf-conventions.readthedocs.org/en/v1.6/ I'm not sure what the gitHub style versioning is, but this looks like this was done with Sphinx. Which is a pretty powerful way to put together a structured document from ReStructured Text source -- and this looks pretty nice -- thanks Richard! (and it can do LaTeX and others for a nice printed version, too). RST would be a LOT easier to manage in an SCM and have a variety of other contribute to than XML. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
