On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Hattersley, Richard < [email protected]> wrote:
> But in that case the model is pushed so far that it's effectively > emulating separate repos. ... > Why emulate separate repos when you can have the real thing? I suppose the reason would be not so much one repo as one gitHub project -- so they would share the issue system, etc. I think that the name list and conventions doc are really quite distinct, so it would actually be _better_ to have completely separate projects in this case. For example, I'm imagining that CF2.* would share the same standard name list as CF 1.*, for example. The name list really is its own "thing". -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
