Roy,

I accept your nitpicking, should I resubmit a complete description with the 
suggested change?

-Barna

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 10:41, Lowry, Roy K. <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Other than the nitpick than 'remove the influence of absorption/scattering by 
> the water itself.' is marginally better English than 'remove the influence of 
> absorption/scattering from the water itself.' this looks perfectly OK to me.
> 
> Cheers, Roy.
> 
> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only working 7.5 
> hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on Wednesdays, my day in 
> the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent to [email protected]. 
> Please also use this e-mail if your requirement is urgent.
> 
> 
> From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of Andrew 
> Barna <[email protected]>
> Sent: 24 April 2017 18:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard name: 
> volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water_corrected_for_pure_water_attenuance
>  
> Hi CF,
> 
> Here is the proposal for the standard name for 
> volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water which has 
> been corrected fro attenuation from the water itself. The definition is 
> almost identical except for the sentence about what "corrected for pure water 
> attenuance" means.
> 
> standard name: 
> volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water_corrected_for_pure_water_attenuance
> canonical units: m-1
> description: Radiative flux is the sum of shortwave and longwave radiative 
> fluxes. In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" 
> implies per unit area, called "flux density" in physics. The volume 
> scattering/absorption/attenuation coefficient is the fractional change of 
> radiative flux per unit path length due to the stated process. Coefficients 
> with canonical units of m2 s-1 i.e. multiplied by density have standard names 
> with specific_ instead of volume_. The scattering/absorption/attenuation 
> coefficient is assumed to be an integral over all wavelengths, unless a 
> coordinate of radiation_wavelength is included to specify the wavelength. 
> Attenuation is the sum of absorption and scattering. Attenuation is sometimes 
> called "extinction". Beam attenuation refers to the decrease of radiative 
> flux along the direction of the incident path. It is distinguished from 
> attenuation of the downwelling component of radiative flux from any incident 
> direction, also called "diffus
 e"
>   attenuation. Corrected for pure water attendance means the attenuation 
> coefficient has been adjusted/calibrated to remove the influence of 
> absorption/scattering from the water itself.
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
> to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
> reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release 
> under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic 
> records management system.

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to