Hi Barna,
No, I'm sure Alison can pick that up as an amendment. Cheers, Roy. Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent to [email protected]. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement is urgent. ________________________________ From: Andrew Barna <[email protected]> Sent: 24 April 2017 19:09 To: Lowry, Roy K. Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard name: volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water_corrected_for_pure_water_attenuance Roy, I accept your nitpicking, should I resubmit a complete description with the suggested change? -Barna > On Apr 24, 2017, at 10:41, Lowry, Roy K. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear All, > > Other than the nitpick than 'remove the influence of absorption/scattering by > the water itself.' is marginally better English than 'remove the influence of > absorption/scattering from the water itself.' this looks perfectly OK to me. > > Cheers, Roy. > > Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only working 7.5 > hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on Wednesdays, my day in > the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent to [email protected]. > Please also use this e-mail if your requirement is urgent. > > > From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of Andrew > Barna <[email protected]> > Sent: 24 April 2017 18:00 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard name: > volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water_corrected_for_pure_water_attenuance > > Hi CF, > > Here is the proposal for the standard name for > volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water which has > been corrected fro attenuation from the water itself. The definition is > almost identical except for the sentence about what "corrected for pure water > attenuance" means. > > standard name: > volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water_corrected_for_pure_water_attenuance > canonical units: m-1 > description: Radiative flux is the sum of shortwave and longwave radiative > fluxes. In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" > implies per unit area, called "flux density" in physics. The volume > scattering/absorption/attenuation coefficient is the fractional change of > radiative flux per unit path length due to the stated process. Coefficients > with canonical units of m2 s-1 i.e. multiplied by density have standard names > with specific_ instead of volume_. The scattering/absorption/attenuation > coefficient is assumed to be an integral over all wavelengths, unless a > coordinate of radiation_wavelength is included to specify the wavelength. > Attenuation is the sum of absorption and scattering. Attenuation is sometimes > called "extinction". Beam attenuation refers to the decrease of radiative > flux along the direction of the incident path. It is distinguished from > attenuation of the downwelling component of radiative flux from any incident > direction, also called "diffuse" > attenuation. Corrected for pure water attendance means the attenuation > coefficient has been adjusted/calibrated to remove the influence of > absorption/scattering from the water itself. > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata CF-metadata Info Page - mailman.cgd.ucar.edu<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata> mailman.cgd.ucar.edu This is an unmoderated list for discussions about interpretation, clarification, and proposals for extensions or change to the CF conventions. > This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject > to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any > reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release > under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic > records management system. ________________________________ This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. ________________________________
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
