Jonathan,
I am confused by your answer to Kenneth. As you know, we already have a
CF attribute named positive that derives from COARDS. CF 1.7 states in
Section 1.3
Vertical coordinates with units of pressure may also be identified
by the*|units|*attribute. Other vertical coordinates must use the
attribute*|positive|*which determines whether the direction of
increasing coordinate value is up or down.
I don't see Kenneth asking for anything new other than an expanded
vocabulary for the attribute, but in your answer I get the impression
that you feel he is asking for something fundamentally different from
what we currently have. Are you suggesting that we should deprecate the
use of the 'positive' attribute? Your response doesn't seem to reflect
the scope of his request.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 9/27/17 7:45 PM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear Ken
Thanks for your email. I sympathise with the problem, but I don't agree with
the proposal. Actually similar suggestions have been made before.
It's an important principle with the standard names that they always indicate
their sign convention. This is so that, if a standard name is provided, the
sign convention is unavoidably specified; if the sign convention were not in
the standard name, but in another attribute e.g. positive, it is certain that
it would be omitted sometimes by mistake. If the sign convention were specified
in the standard name *and* another attribute, it is certain that they would
sometimes be inconsistent by mistake. Either mistake would make the data less
usable. You mention cases where the wrong standard name is given. I agree, that
makes the data less usable too, but I'd say the solution to that is to fix the
data, when the problem has been identified; we should not have to modify the
convention in a way which would make it generally more error-prone. You also
mention cases where you don't have a standard name but you do need a direction.
Presumably you must have some other information in that case about what the
quantity is - which attribute are you using? If it's the long name, you could
put the sign convention in there, for example, as for standard names. New
standard names can also be requested for instrumental quantities, and the
direction doesn't have to be "up" or "down" in standard names. As you probably
know, there are already standard names containing away_from to indicate their
sign convention, just as you suggest.
I agree that there is sometimes a need to know how to relate quantities with
opposite sign conventions in their standard names. The standard names are
mostly systematically constructed, but for use by humans; they aren't designed
to be parsed by machines. If there is a need for some means to deal with this,
I would favour recording the sign convention as a machine-readable extra piece
of information in the standard name table. If we put it in the table, it must
be consistent with the standard name; you'd just have to look it up, instead of
trying to extract it from the standard name.
Best wishes
Jonathan
----- Forwarded message from "Kehoe, Kenneth E." <[email protected]> -----
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:49:20 +0000
From: "Kehoe, Kenneth E." <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [CF-metadata] positive attribute expansion of use and reserved
values
CF-metadata,
I would like to propose an expansion of the use and reserved values for the
“positive” attribute (section 4.3), specifically to include values in addition
to the two reserved values of “up” and “down” to include “towards” and “away”.
Most variables define direction in the standard_name, but with instrumentation
a standard name is often not available or the correct definition of the name
exists with the wrong positive direction. Also, needing to understand or
extract direction from the standard_name can be difficult for a simple tool not
wanting to review the standard_name definition just to see if a transformation
is needed. Expanding the use of the “positive” attribute would reduce the
number of standard names by not needing to include positive direction in the
definition. This would also follow the recommendation of being consistent with
the definition between the standard_name and positive attribute. The “positive”
attribute is currently reserved for use with coordinate dimensions only, but
the same logic can be used with data variables to indicate direction. For
example rate of speed for vertical velocities could be described by indicating
positive = “up” when vertical velocities are positive when moving away from the
surface.
Instruments are also often not installed perpendicular to the surface, and the
coordinate system is better described as towards or away from the instrument.
Specifically for radial instruments. Errors in misunderstanding direction with
radial velocities or accelerations are comment when not specifically defined.
There is no vendor standard.
I’ll leave my suggestion at towards and away, but this could also be expanded
to include cardinal direction for East-West/North-South directions.
Thanks,
Ken
Kenneth E. Kehoe
Research Associate - University of Oklahoma
Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies
ARM Climate Research Facility - Data Quality Office
e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | Office: 303-497-4754 | Cell:
405-826-0299
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
CICS-NC <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc> *Jim Biard*
*Research Scholar*
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
/formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center/
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
o: +1 828 271 4900
/Connect with us on Facebook for climate
<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and geophysics
<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow us
on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate <https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and
@NOAANCEIocngeo <https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>. /
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
