Dear Dan, I send a table with isotopes only in my first proposal back in December: http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2017/059785.html
It was then suggested to merge them into the standard-name table which I tried in the current excel table. I have to agree, this thread has split and is not easy to follow: Starting point: http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2017/059776.html Split by mailmain/new year?: http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/059798.html Best regards, Heiko On 2018-01-18 18:46, Hollis, Dan wrote: > Dear Jonathan / Heiko, > > Could you set up a new table, similar to the area type table, that would list > all permissible isotopes? You could then define a much smaller number of new > standard names with generic descriptions. For a specific dataset the isotope > of interest could then be defined via a scalar coordinate variable. > > Apologies if this has already been suggested. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: CF-metadata [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Gregory > Sent: 18 January 2018 17:24 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and > radioactive particles > > Dear Heiko > > I agree with the construction of these standard names. I see that you are > proposing ~1000 new standard names. The table currently contains ~3000, so > this is not overwhelming, but it is a substantial increment, so I'm just > asking again to confirm: Are we certain that we prefer to do it this way, > with the isotopes in the standard names (like chemical species)? > > What does mPo mean, by the way (compared with just Po)? > > Best wishes > > Jonathan > > ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <[email protected]> ----- > >> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:10:53 +0100 >> From: Heiko Klein <[email protected]> >> To: "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]>, Jonathan Gregory >> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >> radioactive particles >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 >> Thunderbird/52.5.0 >> >> Dear all, >> >> I have the feeling that we all agree now on the usage of isotopes as >> symbols. With this post I try to summarize the proposed standard-names: >> >> >> >> Ash: >> >> mass_concentration_of_volcanic_ash_in_air >> canonical units: g/m^3 >> description: Mass concentration means mass per unit volume and is >> used in the construction mass_concentration_of_X_in_Y, where X is a >> material constituent of Y. "Volcanic_ash" means the fine-grained >> products of explosive volcanic eruptions, such as minerals or >> crystals, older fragmented rock (e.g. andesite), and glass. Particles >> within a volcanic ash cloud have diameters less than 2 mm. >> "Volcanic_ash" does not include non-volcanic dust. >> >> >> >> Radioactivity (without naming the isotopes, general case): >> >> radioactivity_concentration_in_air >> Bq/m3 >> Radioactivity concentration means activity per unit volume >> where activity denotes the number of decays of the material per second. >> >> surface_radioactivity_content >> Bq/m2 >> "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. "Content" >> indicates a quantity per unit area. Radioactivity of X means the number >> of radioactive decays per second. >> >> integral_wrt_time_of_radioactivity_concentration_in_air >> Bq*s/m3 >> The phrase "integral_wrt_X_of_Y" means int Y dX. The >> data variable should have an axis for X specifying the limits of the >> integral as bounds. "wrt" means with respect to. Radioactivity >> concentration means activity per unit volume where activity denotes the >> number of decays per second. >> >> >> >> When naming the isotope, the names are: >> radioactivity_concentration_of_X_in_air >> surface_radioactivity_content_of_X >> integral_wrt_time_of_radioactivity_concentration_of_X_in_air >> with X denoting the isotope as 210mPo. A list of proposed standard-names >> and descriptions (including full element-names) of these is attached. >> >> I hope this summary makes this proposal easier to implement in the >> standard-name table. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Heiko >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2018-01-05 10:30, Lowry, Roy K. wrote: >>> Dear Heiko, >>> >>> >>> That syntax works for me and makes the case for isotopes as symbols. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, Roy. >>> >>> >>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only >>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on >>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent >>> to [email protected]. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement >>> is urgent. >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From:* Heiko Klein <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* 05 January 2018 08:04 >>> *To:* Lowry, Roy K.; Jonathan Gregory; [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >>> radioactive particles >>> >>> Dear Jonathan and Roy, >>> >>> while this is not part of the current proposal, we should think of >>> radionuclides in special chemical bindings. One of the most important >>> one is that of iodine and there we could have: >>> >>> 133I_as_methyl_iodide >>> 132I_as_methyl_iodide >>> >>> as well as >>> >>> 133I_as_hydrogen_iodide >>> 132I_as_hydrogen_iodide >>> >>> >>> By using IUPAC symbols for isotopes and chemical names for chemical >>> elements and compounds, we can have a nice and readable distinction >>> between these two. >>> >>> Basically, I think we all agree that mixed case IUPAC symbols are the >>> best candidate. I will start preparing a list with all proposed names. >>> >>> Heiko >>> >>> >>> On 2018-01-04 17:31, Lowry, Roy K. wrote: >>>> Dear Jonathan, >>>> >>>> >>>> My case for the hyphen is that to me it's a more natural candidate as a >>>> search target. However, if we accept mixed case IUPAC symbols for >>>> isotopes then this becomes a non-issue. In my view it would be extremely >>>> unwise to allow symbols other than for isotopes as we already have >>>> chemical names in the Standard Names. >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, Roy. >>>> >>>> >>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only >>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on >>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent >>>> to [email protected]. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement >>>> is urgent. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> *From:* CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of >>>> Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* 04 January 2018 16:12 >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >>>> radioactive particles >>>> >>>> Dear Heiko and Roy >>>> >>>> I agree with both of you that 210Po would be best i.e. requiring >>>> case-sensitive >>>> symbols for elements. The reason that standard names are (at present) >>>> all lower >>>> case is that case-sensitivity would simply be an opportunity for people >>>> to make >>>> mistakes, while not making them any clearer. I would expect that all >>>> scientists >>>> are aware that the symbols for chemical elements are case-sensitive so >>>> getting >>>> them right will be OK, if we draw attention specifically to this exception. >>>> >>>> Unlike you, if mixed case isn't acceptable to others, I'd prefer >>>> polonium210, >>>> because I don't think including _ or - would make it easier to understand. >>>> >>>> Another issue, though: we already have element *names* in many standard >>>> names. >>>> I presume we are not proposing to replace these with chemical element >>>> symbols. >>>> That is, we will not start writing Po for polonium in general. Is this new >>>> orthography just for the case when you want to specify a particular >>>> isotope? >>>> >>>> I'm glad that "radioactivity" is acceptable to experts. I hope it won't be >>>> confusing. I do think that people from other disciplines will be alerted by >>>> that word more effectively. >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> >>>> Jonathan >>>> >>>> ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <[email protected]> ----- >>>> >>>>> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:07:18 +0100 >>>>> From: Heiko Klein <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]>, Jonathan Gregory >>>>> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >>>>> radioactive particles >>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 >>>>> Thunderbird/52.5.0 >>>>> >>>>> Dear Roy, >>>>> >>>>> I agree very much with the nomenclature used in the BODC dictionary. >>>>> >>>>> I would rule out a few of your options: When thinking of metastates, >>>>> some cases don't work, f.e. 180mta and 180mtantalum. >>>>> As you also mentioned, the number before the full-name (210-polonium) in >>>>> never used, either number before abbreviation (210Po) or number after >>>>> full-name (polonium-210). Thus the options are slightly less, but the >>>>> preference remains the same: >>>>> >>>>> 210Po (requires mixed case) >>>>> polonium-210 (requires hyphens) >>>>> polonium_210 >>>>> polonium210 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Heiko >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2018-01-04 10:35, Lowry, Roy K. wrote: >>>>>> Dear Heiko, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For reference, the presentation syntax we use in the BODC parameter >>>>>> dictionary is of the form: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Activity of polonium-210 {210Po CAS 13981-52-7} per unit dry weight of >>>>>> suspended particulate material by filtration and gamma spectroscopy >>>>>> (high-purity Ge detector) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We use 'activity' as the technical term from the radio-chemistry >>>>>> community for decays per unit time, but I could live with >>>>>> 'radioactivity', even though its semantics to specialists are much >>>>>> broader. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a built-in synonym exposure and so are able to use two >>>>>> representations of the isotope name. We went for polonium-210 rather >>>>>> than 210-polonium due to common English language usage (try Googling >>>>>> 210-polonium: the top hits come back as polonium-210). The syntax 210Po >>>>>> is the only way to stay sane when writing formulae for compounds >>>>>> containing multiple isotopes. As you say, the ability to use >>>>>> superscripts would be very helpful, but that isn't going to happen in >>>>>> Standard Names! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My vote for isotope labelling syntax depends upon what established >>>>>> conventions (if any) the CF community are prepared to break - mixed case >>>>>> or hyphens. The alternatives in my order or preference are: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 210Po (requires mixed case) >>>>>> >>>>>> 210po >>>>>> >>>>>> polonium-210 (requires hyphens) >>>>>> >>>>>> 210-polonium (requires hyphens) >>>>>> >>>>>> polonium_210 >>>>>> >>>>>> 210_polonium >>>>>> >>>>>> polonium210 >>>>>> >>>>>> 210polonium >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So our preferences are the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, Roy. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only >>>>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on >>>>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent >>>>>> to [email protected]. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement >>>>>> is urgent. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> *From:* CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of >>>>>> Heiko Klein <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* 04 January 2018 08:49 >>>>>> *To:* Jonathan Gregory; [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >>>>>> radioactive particles >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Jonathan and Roy, >>>>>> >>>>>> after some internal discussions, we agree to the change of the name from >>>>>> activity_* to radioactivity_* to make the name more universal. >>>>>> >>>>>> Concerning the names of the radionuclides, we will need to include the >>>>>> mass-number, since there is no other distinction. I suggest using >>>>>> mass-number and the IUPAC element abbreviation, e.g. 3H. Typically, the >>>>>> 3 should be a superscript but that won't be possible here. Metastates >>>>>> are then named like 180mTa. This requires upper-case letters. >>>>>> >>>>>> If CF-standard_names don't like abbreviations, an alternative would be >>>>>> to use the hyphen notation, i.e. hydrogen-3 and tantalum-180m (see >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope) - but I have never seen >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> en.wikipedia.org >>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> en.wikipedia.org >>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> >>> Isotope - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope> >>> en.wikipedia.org >>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>> >>> >>> >>>> en.wikipedia.org >>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> en.wikipedia.org >>>>>> Isotope vs. nuclide. A nuclide is a species of an atom with a specific >>>>>> number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, for example carbon-13 >>>>>> with 6 protons and 7 neutrons. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> radionuclides been written out except on wikipedia, and the CF-guideline >>>>>> document forbids dash '-' as far as I can see. So I prefer the >>>>>> abbreviation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Heiko >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-01-03 18:22, Jonathan Gregory wrote: >>>>>>> Dear Heiko and Roy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am happy to agree with you that we should retain the radioactive >>>>>>> species in >>>>>>> the standard names, given (a) the number is not huge and as Roy said >>>>>>> they would >>>>>>> be added only as needed, (b) the distinction between these species and >>>>>>> other >>>>>>> chemical species is blurred, (c) there is no satisfactory external >>>>>>> authority >>>>>>> we could rely upon. We should be systematic about how we write the >>>>>>> names of >>>>>>> these species, as far as possible. For chemical species, we have not >>>>>>> used >>>>>>> numerals, and they are in lower case, as all standard names are (so >>>>>>> far). I'm >>>>>>> not sure those conventions can work for the names of nuclides though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best wishes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Forwarded message from "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]> ----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:52:01 +0000 >>>>>>>> From: "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> To: Heiko Klein <[email protected]>, Jonathan Gregory >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >>>>>>>> radioactive particles >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Heiko, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Check with Alison to see if you need to do anything to prevent the >>>>>>>> volcanic ash proposal becoming blocked. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are more possible isotopes than I intuitively expected, but as >>>>>>>> CF philosophy is only to generate Standard Names on an 'as needed' >>>>>>>> basis the numbers should be manageable. Having the possibility of >>>>>>>> stable and radioactive compounds - say H2O (water) and 3H2O (tritiated >>>>>>>> water) - makes the clean separation of 'isotopes' and >>>>>> 'chemicals' impossible and could get very messy with say 'water' >>>>>> included in the Standard Name and 'tritiated water' normalised out into >>>>>> an isotope controlled vocabulary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Consequently, I share your preference for managing isotopes as >>>>>>>> chemicals in Standard names. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, Roy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Heiko Klein [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>> Sent: 03 January 2018 13:13 >>>>>>>> To: Lowry, Roy K. <[email protected]>; Jonathan Gregory >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; >>>>>>>> SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash and >>>>>>>> radioactive particles >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Roy and Jonathan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> should I split the volcanic ash and radioactive partcles proposal? It >>>>>>>> seems like ash is easily accepted, while radioactivity needs some >>>>>>>> discussions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will here with our experts if radioactivity can replace activity, or >>>>>>>> if this is ambiguous in the nuclear community. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Concerning the isotopes, my current list has close to 400 elements. >>>>>>>> Most of them are pure radionuclides / isotopes, but some of them are >>>>>>>> radioactive meta-states (with different half-life), and others are >>>>>>>> chemical compounds of radioactive isotopes, which have very different >>>>>>>> transport properties and/or effects (e.g. iodine as >>>>>> I2, ICH3, ICs) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The IAEA International Radiological Information Exchange (IRIX) format >>>>>>>> http://bip.paa.gov.pl/download/105/23784/Zalacznik6IRIXFormatv10ReferenceDescription.pdf >>>>>>>> allows either nuclides directly or nuclide combinations, but even this >>>>>>>> expert format has problems covering most cases. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I prefer having everything in the standard_name, in particular if >>>>>>>> there is no external community actively doing own standardization. In >>>>>>>> addition, I don't even know what to call this external list, >>>>>>>> 'radioactive_material' maybe, to allow for both nuclides, metastates >>>>>>>> and compounds? I still hope to get them into the >>>>>> standard_name liste. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heiko >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2017-12-22 17:43, Lowry, Roy K. wrote: >>>>>>>>> Dear Jonathan, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think the number of possible isotope names is relatively small (<100 >>>>>>>>> - please correct me if I'm wrong) compared to the thousand upon >>>>>>>>> thousand of possible biological taxa. If so, I wonder if normalising >>>>>>>>> out the isotope name is worth the effort of maintaining the standard >>>>>>>>> list and complication to client software. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, Roy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only >>>>>>>>> working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on >>>>>>>>> Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be >>>>>>>>> sent to [email protected]. Please also use this e-mail if your >>>>>>>>> requirement is urgent. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> *From:* CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of >>>>>>>>> Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 22 December 2017 15:17 >>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash >>>>>>>>> and radioactive particles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Heiko and Barbara >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see that "activity concentration" is an technical term, but in the >>>>>>>>> broader context of the CF standard name table I feel it would be >>>>>>>>> better to say radioactivity_concentration and radioactivity_content, >>>>>>>>> to make it clear what sort of activity it's about. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As you say, we name chemical species in standard names, but there are >>>>>>>>> not so many of these that have been requested. I think it's a choice >>>>>>>>> to be made about whether isotopes should be named explicitly. In the >>>>>>>>> analogous case of biological taxa, >>>>>>>>> https://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/99 discussed not putting their >>>>>>>>> identifiers in the standard name. That discussion wasn't concluded. A >>>>>>>>> similar approach could be taken here, of putting "isotope" in the >>>>>>>>> standard name, and requiring there to be a string-valued coordinate >>>>>>>>> variable identifying the isotope from a standard list (like area types >>>>>>>>> and regions). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best wishes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <[email protected]> ----- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:41:42 +0100 >>>>>>>>>> From: Heiko Klein <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> To: SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name proposal for volcanic ash >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> radioactive particles >>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 >>>>>>>>>> Thunderbird/52.5.0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Barbara and list, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree with you that both volcanic ash and nuclear particles are >>>>>>>>>> insufficiently reflected in the standard-name table and we need a >>>>>>>>>> proposal for new names. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have 'atmosphere_mass_content_of_volcanic_ash' which is the column >>>>>>>>>> load and for concentrations, we have mass_concentration_of_*_in_air >>>>>>>>>> so I would slightly modify your parameter and propose: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mass_concentration_of_volcanic_ash_in_air >>>>>>>>>> canonical units: g/m^3 >>>>>>>>>> description: Mass concentration means mass per unit volume and is >>>>>>>>>> used in the construction mass_concentration_of_X_in_Y, where X is a >>>>>>>>>> material constituent of Y. "Volcanic_ash" means the fine-grained >>>>>>>>>> products of explosive volcanic eruptions, such as minerals or >>>>>>>>>> crystals, older fragmented rock (e.g. andesite), and glass. Particles >>>>>>>>>> within a volcanic ash cloud have diameters less than 2 mm. >>>>>>>>>> "Volcanic_ash" does not include non-volcanic dust. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Concerning radioactivity, the situation is more difficult. I would >>>>>>>>>> say we have 2 basic types: concentrations in air and depositions, and >>>>>>>>>> the time-integral of the first. I would call depositions >>>>>>>>>> 'surface_content' >>>>>>>>>> in CF, since content is defined as: a quantity per unit area. I >>>>>>>>>> propose the following: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> activity_concentration_of_X_in_air (Bq/m3) >>>>>>>>>> Description: Activity concentration means activity per unit volume >>>>>>>>>> and is used in the construction activity_concentration_of_X_in_Y, >>>>>>>>>> where X is a radioactive material and activity denotes the number of >>>>>>>>>> decays of the material per second. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> surface_activity_content_of_X (Bq/m2) >>>>>>>>>> Description: "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. >>>>>>>>>> "Content" indicates a quantity per unit area. activity of X means the >>>>>>>>>> number of radioactive decays of the material X per second. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The first is often integrated over time for dose-calculations, i.e. >>>>>>>>>> integral_wrt_time in CF-nomenclature: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> integral_wrt_time_of_activity_concentration_of_X_in_air (Bq*s/m3) >>>>>>>>>> Description: The phrase "integral_wrt_X_of_Y" means int Y dX. The >>>>>>>>>> data variable should have an axis for X specifying the limits of the >>>>>>>>>> integral as bounds. "wrt" means with respect to. Activity >>>>>>>>>> concentration means activity per unit volume and is used in the >>>>>>>>>> construction activity_concentration_of_X_in_Y, where X is a >>>>>>>>>> radioactive material and activity denotes the number of decays of >>>>>>>>>> the material per second. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The tricky part is the X here, which is a very long list of >>>>>>>>>> radioactive isotopes. I attach the list which is in active use for >>>>>>>>>> us, i.e. 383 nuclides including a few meta-states and chemical >>>>>>>>>> speciations in particular for Iodine. Usual names for thes ar the >>>>>>>>>> second and third column, i.e. H3, Na24, Ar41, Ge77m, Ge77 ... In CF, >>>>>>>>>> it is most common to have these names in the standard-name (X in >>>>>>>>>> above proposals) I'm not sure if it is practical possible to add >>>>>>>>>> these 4*383 standard-names to the list? If it is just a question of >>>>>>>>>> formatting, I can try to do that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heiko >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2017-12-18 14:36, SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER Barbara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to ask some questions about appropriate standard names of >>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>> variables: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking for the standard name of mean concentration of volcanic >>>>>>>>>>> ash at specific altitude levels. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I used >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mass_concentration_of_ash_in_air >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but the CF convention checker realizes that this is an invalid >>>>>>>>>>> standard_name. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, I did not find a valid standard name yet. Do you >>>>>>>>>>> have any recommendations? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I'm looking for some standard names for variables >>>>>>>>>>> related to radioactivity. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I used >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> deposited_activity_concentration (in Bq/m2). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> time_integrated_activity_concentration_in_air (Bq s/m3). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The first variable contains information about the deposited >>>>>>>>>>> activity concentration that depends on the type of the nuclide, >>>>>>>>>>> time, latitude, and longitude. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The second variable contains information about the time-integrated >>>>>>>>>>> activity concentration of different radionuclides at specific >>>>>>>>>>> levels. >>>>>>>>>>> It's dimensions are type of the nuclide, time, height, latitude, >>>>>>>>>>> and longitude. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any recommendation concerning the standard names of >>>>>>>>>>> these variables? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Finally, I need to define a variable that contains the information >>>>>>>>>>> about the radioactive nuclide itself. I defined a character >>>>>>>>>>> variable that uses the (invalid) standard name: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> radioactive_nuclides >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you also have advice for the standard name of this variable? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your help! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Barbara >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Barbara Scherllin-Pirscher >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fachabteilung Chemische Wettervorhersage/Section Chemical Weather >>>>>>>>>>> Forecasts >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bereich Daten, Methoden, Modelle/Division Data, Methods, Models >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ZAMG - Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A-1190 Wien, Hohe Warte 38 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tel.: +43 1 36026 2380 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fax: +43 1 36026 74 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>__ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> www.zamg.ac.at <http://www.zamg.ac.at> <http://www.zamg.ac.at> >>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at> >>>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at> >>>>>> <http://www.zamg.ac.at/> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Join us on facebook: www.facebook.com/zamg.at >>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at> >>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at> >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/zamg.at> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung: >>>>>>>>>>> Beschreibung: >>>>>>>>>>> cid:099c01ccebf6$aa43e440$7ba4168a@zadpc6 <http://www.zamg.at/> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute >>>>>>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern >>>>>>>>>> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1 H - 3 0 0.178E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 2 Na- 24 2 0.128E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 3 Ar- 41 0 0.105E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 4 Co- 58 2 0.113E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 5 Co- 60 2 0.416E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 6 Zn- 72 2 0.414E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 7 Ga- 72 2 0.137E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 8 Ga- 73 2 0.395E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 9 Ge- 75 2 0.140E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 10 Ge- 77m 2 0.128E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 11 Ge- 77 2 0.170E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 12 Ge- 78 2 0.133E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 13 As- 77 2 0.496E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 14 As- 78 2 0.127E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 15 Se- 79 2 0.338E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 16 Se- 81m 2 0.202E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 17 Se- 81 2 0.625E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 18 Se- 83m 2 0.990E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 19 Se- 83 2 0.513E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 20 Br- 82m 2 0.189E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 21 Br- 82 2 0.544E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 22 Br- 83 2 0.802E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 23 Br- 84m 2 0.193E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 24 Br- 84 2 0.363E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 25 Kr- 83m 0 0.104E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 26 Kr- 85m 0 0.438E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 27 Kr- 85 0 0.203E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 28 Kr- 87 0 0.152E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 29 Kr- 88 0 0.686E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 30 Kr- 89 0 0.364E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 31 Rb- 86m 2 0.114E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 32 Rb- 86 2 0.430E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 33 Rb- 87 2 0.470E-18 >>>>>>>>>> 34 Rb- 88 2 0.642E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 35 Rb- 89 2 0.760E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 36 Sr- 89 2 0.154E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 37 Sr- 90 2 0.787E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 38 Sr- 91 2 0.203E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 39 Sr- 92 2 0.711E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 40 Y - 90m 2 0.604E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 41 Y - 90 2 0.301E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 42 Y - 91m 2 0.232E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 43 Y - 91 2 0.137E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 44 Y - 92 2 0.545E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 45 Y - 93 2 0.189E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 46 Y - 94 2 0.608E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 47 Y - 95 2 0.110E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 48 Zr- 93 2 0.231E-13 >>>>>>>>>> 49 Zr- 95 2 0.123E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 50 Zr- 97 2 0.115E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 51 Nb- 94m 2 0.185E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 52 Nb- 94 2 0.110E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 53 Nb- 95m 2 0.222E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 54 Nb- 95 2 0.228E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 55 Nb- 96 2 0.823E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 56 Nb- 97m 2 0.128E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 57 Nb- 97 2 0.157E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 58 Nb- 98 2 0.227E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 59 Mo- 99 2 0.289E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 60 Mo-101 2 0.791E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 61 Mo-102 2 0.104E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 62 Tc- 99m 2 0.320E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 63 Tc- 99 2 0.103E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 64 Tc-101 2 0.814E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 65 Tc-102m 2 0.269E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 66 Tc-102 2 0.131E+00 >>>>>>>>>> 67 Tc-104 2 0.642E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 68 Ru-103 2 0.203E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 69 Ru-105 2 0.434E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 70 Ru-106 2 0.219E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 71 Rh-103m 2 0.206E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 72 Rh-105m 2 0.182E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 73 Rh-105 2 0.542E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 74 Rh-106m 2 0.883E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 75 Rh-106 2 0.232E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 76 Rh-107 2 0.532E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 77 Pd-107m 2 0.325E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 78 Pd-107 2 0.338E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 79 Pd-109 2 0.143E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 80 Pd-111m 2 0.350E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 81 Pd-111 2 0.525E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 82 Pd-112 2 0.958E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 83 Ag-109m 2 0.175E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 84 Ag-110m 2 0.297E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 85 Ag-111m 2 0.937E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 86 Ag-111 2 0.107E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 87 Ag-112 2 0.615E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 88 Ag-113m 2 0.105E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 89 Ag-113 2 0.363E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 90 Ag-115m 2 0.408E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 91 Ag-115 2 0.550E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 92 Cd-111m 2 0.237E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 93 Cd-113m 2 0.151E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 94 Cd-113 2 0.244E-23 >>>>>>>>>> 95 Cd-115m 2 0.180E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 96 Cd-115 2 0.360E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 97 Cd-117m 2 0.566E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 98 Cd-117 2 0.741E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 99 Cd-118 2 0.230E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 100 In-113m 2 0.116E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 101 In-115m 2 0.428E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 102 In-115 2 0.431E-23 >>>>>>>>>> 103 In-116m 2 0.213E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 104 In-116 2 0.488E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 105 In-117m 2 0.993E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 106 In-117 2 0.263E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 107 In-118m 2 0.263E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 108 In-118 2 0.139E+00 >>>>>>>>>> 109 In-119m 2 0.642E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 110 In-119 2 0.462E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 111 Sn-117m 2 0.573E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 112 Sn-119m 2 0.328E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 113 Sn-121m 2 0.440E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 114 Sn-121 2 0.718E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 115 Sn-123m 2 0.289E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 116 Sn-123 2 0.622E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 117 Sn-125 2 0.831E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 118 Sn-126 2 0.220E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 119 Sn-127 2 0.908E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 120 Sn-128 2 0.196E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 121 Sn-130 2 0.312E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 122 Sb-124m 2 0.569E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 123 Sb-124 2 0.133E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 124 Sb-125 2 0.805E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 125 Sb-126m 2 0.608E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 126 Sb-126 2 0.647E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 127 Sb-127 2 0.211E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 128 Sb-128m 2 0.111E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 129 Sb-128 2 0.214E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 130 Sb-129 2 0.444E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 131 Sb-130m 2 0.175E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 132 Sb-130 2 0.312E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 133 Sb-131 2 0.502E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 134 Te-125m 2 0.138E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 135 Te-127m 2 0.736E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 136 Te-127 2 0.205E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 137 Te-129m 2 0.240E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 138 Te-129 2 0.165E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 139 Te-131m 2 0.642E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 140 Te-131 2 0.462E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 141 Te-132 2 0.247E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 142 Te-133m 2 0.209E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 143 Te-133 2 0.924E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 144 Te-134 2 0.275E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 145 I -129 1 0.138E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 146 I -130m 1 0.130E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 147 I -130 1 0.155E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 148 I -131 1 0.994E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 149 I -132 1 0.836E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 150 I -133m 1 0.770E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 151 I -133 1 0.921E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 152 I -134m 1 0.321E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 153 I -134 1 0.222E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 154 I -135 1 0.288E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 155 Xe-129m 0 0.100E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 156 Xe-131m 0 0.680E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 157 Xe-133m 0 0.355E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 158 Xe-133 0 0.152E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 159 Xe-134m 0 0.239E+01 >>>>>>>>>> 160 Xe-135m 0 0.743E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 161 Xe-135 0 0.210E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 162 Xe-137 0 0.296E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 163 Xe-138 0 0.815E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 164 Cs-134m 2 0.664E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 165 Cs-134 2 0.107E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 166 Cs-135m 2 0.218E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 167 Cs-135 2 0.956E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 168 Cs-136 2 0.617E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 169 Cs-137 2 0.729E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 170 Cs-138 2 0.359E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 171 Ba-135m 2 0.671E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 172 Ba-137m 2 0.453E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 173 Ba-139 2 0.139E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 174 Ba-140 2 0.627E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 175 La-140 2 0.456E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 176 La-141 2 0.498E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 177 La-142 2 0.125E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 178 La-143 2 0.825E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 179 Ce-141 2 0.243E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 180 Ce-142 2 0.440E-24 >>>>>>>>>> 181 Ce-143 2 0.584E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 182 Ce-144 2 0.282E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 183 Ce-146 2 0.814E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 184 Pr-142m 2 0.791E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 185 Pr-142 2 0.101E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 186 Pr-143 2 0.591E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 187 Pr-144m 2 0.161E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 188 Pr-144 2 0.669E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 189 Pr-145 2 0.322E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 190 Pr-146 2 0.477E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 191 Pr-147 2 0.963E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 192 Nd-144 2 0.105E-22 >>>>>>>>>> 193 Nd-147 2 0.730E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 194 Nd-149 2 0.111E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 195 Nd-151 2 0.932E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 196 Nd-152 2 0.101E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 197 Pm-147 2 0.838E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 198 Pm-148m 2 0.194E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 199 Pm-148 2 0.149E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 200 Pm-149 2 0.363E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 201 Pm-150 2 0.718E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 202 Pm-151 2 0.678E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 203 Pm-152m 2 0.642E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 204 Pm-152 2 0.282E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 205 Sm-147 2 0.205E-18 >>>>>>>>>> 206 Sm-148 2 0.275E-23 >>>>>>>>>> 207 Sm-149 2 0.220E-23 >>>>>>>>>> 208 Sm-151 2 0.236E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 209 Sm-153 2 0.414E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 210 Sm-155 2 0.520E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 211 Sm-156 2 0.205E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 212 Eu-154 2 0.256E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 213 Eu-155 2 0.458E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 214 Eu-156 2 0.528E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 215 Eu-157 2 0.127E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 216 Eu-158 2 0.252E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 217 Eu-159 2 0.638E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 218 Gd-159 2 0.104E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 219 Gd-162 2 0.116E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 220 Tb-160 2 0.111E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 221 Tb-161 2 0.116E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 222 Tb-162m 2 0.863E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 223 Tb-162 2 0.155E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 224 Tb-163 2 0.592E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 225 Dy-165 2 0.819E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 226 Hg-206 2 0.144E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 227 Tl-206 2 0.276E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 228 Tl-207 2 0.241E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 229 Tl-208 2 0.373E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 230 Tl-209 2 0.525E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 231 Tl-210 2 0.889E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 232 Pb-207m 2 0.866E+00 >>>>>>>>>> 233 Pb-209 2 0.583E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 234 Pb-210 2 0.105E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 235 Pb-211 2 0.320E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 236 Pb-212 2 0.181E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 237 Pb-213 2 0.116E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 238 Pb-214 2 0.431E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 239 Bi-209 2 0.110E-25 >>>>>>>>>> 240 Bi-210 2 0.160E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 241 Bi-211 2 0.537E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 242 Bi-212 2 0.191E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 243 Bi-213 2 0.246E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 244 Bi-214 2 0.586E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 245 Bi-215 2 0.165E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 246 Po-210 2 0.580E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 247 Po-211 2 0.133E+01 >>>>>>>>>> 248 Po-212 2 0.228E+07 >>>>>>>>>> 249 Po-213 2 0.165E+06 >>>>>>>>>> 250 Po-214 2 0.423E+04 >>>>>>>>>> 251 Po-215 2 0.389E+03 >>>>>>>>>> 252 Po-216 2 0.462E+01 >>>>>>>>>> 253 Po-217 2 0.693E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 254 Po-218 2 0.379E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 255 At-215 2 0.693E+04 >>>>>>>>>> 256 At-216 2 0.231E+04 >>>>>>>>>> 257 At-217 2 0.217E+02 >>>>>>>>>> 258 At-218 2 0.347E+00 >>>>>>>>>> 259 At-219 2 0.128E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 260 Rn-218 2 0.198E+02 >>>>>>>>>> 261 Rn-219 2 0.173E+00 >>>>>>>>>> 262 Rn-220 2 0.126E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 263 Rn-221 2 0.462E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 264 Rn-222 2 0.210E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 265 Rn-223 2 0.269E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 266 Fr-221 2 0.241E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 267 Fr-222 2 0.781E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 268 Fr-223 2 0.525E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 269 Ra-222 2 0.182E-01 >>>>>>>>>> 270 Ra-223 0 0.702E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 271 Ra-224 0 0.220E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 272 Ra-225 0 0.542E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 273 Ra-226 0 0.137E-10 >>>>>>>>>> 274 Ra-227 0 0.280E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 275 Ra-228 0 0.328E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 276 Ra-229 0 0.693E+12 >>>>>>>>>> 277 Ac-225 2 0.802E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 278 Ac-226 2 0.664E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 279 Ac-227 2 0.102E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 280 Ac-228 2 0.314E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 281 Ac-229 2 0.175E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 282 Th-226 2 0.374E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 283 Th-227 2 0.441E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 284 Th-228 2 0.115E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 285 Th-229 2 0.299E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 286 Th-230 2 0.275E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 287 Th-231 2 0.755E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 288 Th-232 2 0.156E-17 >>>>>>>>>> 289 Th-233 2 0.520E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 290 Th-234 2 0.333E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 291 Pa-230 2 0.453E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 292 Pa-231 2 0.676E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 293 Pa-232 2 0.612E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 294 Pa-233 2 0.297E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 295 Pa-234m 2 0.987E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 296 Pa-234 2 0.285E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 297 U -230 2 0.386E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 298 U -231 2 0.187E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 299 U -232 2 0.305E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 300 U -233 2 0.136E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 301 U -234 2 0.889E-13 >>>>>>>>>> 302 U -235 2 0.309E-16 >>>>>>>>>> 303 U -236 2 0.919E-15 >>>>>>>>>> 304 U -237 2 0.119E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 305 U -238 2 0.487E-17 >>>>>>>>>> 306 U -239 2 0.492E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 307 U -240 2 0.134E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 308 Np-235 2 0.196E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 309 Np-236m 2 0.170E-15 >>>>>>>>>> 310 Np-236 2 0.875E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 311 Np-237 2 0.103E-13 >>>>>>>>>> 312 Np-238 2 0.382E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 313 Np-239 2 0.341E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 314 Np-240m 2 0.158E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 315 Np-240 2 0.183E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 316 Pu-235 2 0.444E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 317 Pu-236 2 0.771E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 318 Pu-237 2 0.176E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 319 Pu-238 2 0.255E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 320 Pu-239 2 0.900E-12 >>>>>>>>>> 321 Pu-240 2 0.334E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 322 Pu-241 2 0.166E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 323 Pu-242 2 0.580E-13 >>>>>>>>>> 324 Pu-243 2 0.387E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 325 Pu-244 2 0.275E-15 >>>>>>>>>> 326 Pu-245 2 0.193E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 327 Am-240 2 0.378E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 328 Am-241 2 0.480E-10 >>>>>>>>>> 329 Am-242* 2 0.495E+02 >>>>>>>>>> 330 Am-242m 2 0.145E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 331 Am-242 2 0.120E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 332 Am-243 2 0.276E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 333 Am-244m 2 0.444E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 334 Am-244 2 0.191E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 335 Am-245 2 0.917E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 336 Cm-241 2 0.229E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 337 Cm-242 2 0.492E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 338 Cm-243 2 0.686E-09 >>>>>>>>>> 339 Cm-244 2 0.125E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 340 Cm-245 2 0.236E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 341 Cm-246 2 0.399E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 342 Cm-247 2 0.137E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 343 Cm-248 2 0.467E-13 >>>>>>>>>> 344 Cm-249 2 0.181E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 345 Cm-250 2 0.318E-11 >>>>>>>>>> 346 Bk-249 2 0.255E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 347 Bk-250 2 0.598E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 348 Cf-249 2 0.610E-10 >>>>>>>>>> 349 Cf-250 2 0.169E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 350 Cf-251 2 0.275E-10 >>>>>>>>>> 351 Cf-252 2 0.829E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 352 Cf-253 2 0.456E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 353 Cf-254 2 0.133E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 354 Es-253 2 0.392E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 355 Es-254m 2 0.491E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 356 Es-254 2 0.291E-07 >>>>>>>>>> 357 Es-255 2 0.209E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 358 C - 11 0 0.567E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 359 N - 13 0 0.116E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 360 O - 15 0 0.567E-02 >>>>>>>>>> 361 F - 18 0 0.115E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 380 Mn- 54 2 2.571E-08 >>>>>>>>>> 545 I -129e 1 0.138E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 645 I -129o 1 0.138E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 745 I -129a 1 0.138E-14 >>>>>>>>>> 547 I -130e 1 0.155E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 647 I -130o 1 0.155E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 747 I -130a 1 0.155E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 548 I -131e 1 0.994E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 648 I -131o 1 0.994E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 748 I -131a 1 0.994E-06 >>>>>>>>>> 549 I -132e 1 0.836E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 649 I -132o 1 0.836E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 749 I -132a 1 0.836E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 551 I -133e 1 0.921E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 651 I -133o 1 0.921E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 751 I -133a 1 0.921E-05 >>>>>>>>>> 553 I -134e 1 0.222E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 653 I -134o 1 0.222E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 753 I -134a 1 0.222E-03 >>>>>>>>>> 554 I -135e 1 0.288E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 654 I -135o 1 0.288E-04 >>>>>>>>>> 754 I -135a 1 0.288E-04 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- End forwarded message ----- >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC >>>>>>>>> is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of >>>>>>>>> this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it >>>>>>>>> is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC >>>>>>>>> may be stored in an electronic records management system. >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute >>>>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern >>>>>>>> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC >>>>>>>> is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of >>>>>>>> this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it >>>>>>>> is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC >>>>>>>> may be stored in an electronic records management system. >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- End forwarded message ----- >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute >>>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern >>>>>> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is >>>>>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this >>>>>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is >>>>>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be >>>>>> stored in an electronic records management system. >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute >>>>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern >>>>> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY >>>> >>>> ----- End forwarded message ----- >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is >>>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this >>>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is >>>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be >>>> stored in an electronic records management system. >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute >>> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern >>> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is >>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this >>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is >>> exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be >>> stored in an electronic records management system. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute >> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern >> http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > -- Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
