Dear Martin, Jonathan, Karl,

I have had another look at these two names and amended the definitions in the 
light of the discussion.

fraction_of_rainfall_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
'The quantity with standard name 
fraction_of_rainfall_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow is the mass of rainfall 
falling onto snow as a fraction of the mass of rainfall falling within the area 
of interest. The horizontal domain over which the quantity is calculated is 
described by the associated coordinate variables and coordinate bounds or by a 
coordinate variable or scalar coordinate variable with the standard name of 
"region" supplied according to section 6.1.1 of the CF conventions. The phrase 
"surface_snow" means snow lying on the surface.'

fraction_of_solid_precipitation_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
'Solid precipitation refers to the precipitation of water in the solid phase. 
Water in the atmosphere exists in one of three phases: solid, liquid or vapor. 
The solid phase can exist as snow, hail, graupel, cloud ice, or as a component 
of aerosol. The quantity with standard name 
fraction_of_solid_precipitation_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow is the mass of 
solid precipitation falling onto snow as a fraction of the mass of solid 
precipitation falling within the area of interest. The horizontal domain over 
which the quantity is calculated is described by the associated coordinate 
variables and coordinate bounds or by a coordinate variable or scalar 
coordinate variable with the standard name of "region" supplied according to 
section 6.1.1 of the CF conventions. The phrase "surface_snow" means snow lying 
on the surface.'

Are these okay? If so I think they can be accepted.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory     
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.

-----Original Message-----
From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alison 
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 11 June 2018 11:33
To: 'Karl Taylor' <[email protected]>; Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) 
<[email protected]>; CF-metadata ([email protected]) 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Precipitation fractions for LS3MIP

Dear Martin, Karl and Steve,

Thank you for the proposing these two names and the comments received so far.

fraction_of_rainfall_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1) 'The phrase 
"surface_snow" means snow lying on the surface.'

fraction_of_solid_precipitation_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1) 'The phrase 
"surface_snow" means snow lying on the surface. Solid precipitation refers to 
the precipitation of water in the solid phase. Water in the atmosphere exists 
in one of three phases: solid, liquid or vapor. The solid phase can exist as 
snow, hail, graupel, cloud ice, or as a component of aerosol.'

The names and units look fine.

Are these variables calculated over quite large areas? If so, would it be 
appropriate to add the following sentence to their definitions:
'The horizontal domain over which the quantity is calculated is described by 
the associated coordinate variables and coordinate bounds or by a coordinate 
variable or scalar coordinate variable with the standard name of "region" 
supplied according to section 6.1.1 of the CF conventions'?

This is what we do with names like land_ice_mass where the quantity might 
represent the mass of a whole ice sheet, rather than something calculated in a 
small lat-long grid box.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory     
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.

From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Karl Taylor
Sent: 05 June 2018 17:03
To: Steven Emmerson <[email protected]>; Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) 
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Precipitation fractions for LS3MIP

Hi all,

I think in common usage "mass fraction" is the ratio of the mass of a 
particular species to the total mass of all species combined (e.g., the mass 
fraction of oxygen molecules in air). For the variable considered here, the 
fraction refers to the ratio of the mass of as particular "species" (e.g., 
rain) that falls on a particular surface (e.g., surface snow). This is enough 
different from the standard usage that I think it would be wise to avoid "mass 
fraction" in the standard name; thus, the suggestion:

fraction_of_rainfall_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow

Using "mass_fraction" here might lead some to wrongly jump to an interpretation 
that this had something to do with the fraction of precipitation that was 
falling as rain.

best regards,
Karl
On 6/5/18 7:55 AM, Steven Emmerson wrote:
Greetings,

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC 
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
We don't want the mass per unit area on snow divided by the mass per unit area 
on the whole grid cell, but rather, as Jonathan has spelled out, the mass on 
snow divided by the mass on the whole grid cell. Hence, I support Karl's 
suggestion of using "mass" in the name, rather than "amount".

I believe that's called a "mass fraction". See Table 12 of 
<https://www.nist.gov/pml/nist-guide-si-chapter-8-comments-some-quantities-and-their-units>.
 

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to