Dear Alison, Jonathan,


Thanks for these final suggestions. I agree with these proposals. I have a 
reservation about the interpretation of "sensible heat flux" which was 
mentioned in the discussion, but that does not need to delay approval of these 
proposed terms which neatly avoid the problem.


The usage of "sensible heat flux" outside the standard name list consistently 
refer to it as a thermodynamic property, not something which is specific to a 
particular medium. In the existing standard names which include the phrase 
"sensible_heat_flux" the descriptive text suggests that it applies to heat flux 
through air alone, implicitly excluding any heat flux conveyed by 
precipitation. It looks to me as though the wording is a reflection of the 
state of models at the time the standard names were defined, when it may have 
been reasonable to omit mention of transport of heat by precipitation and 
equate sensible heat flux at the surface to turbulent heat flux at the surface. 
As models can now, apparently, resolve the sensible heat flux associated with 
falling rain, I can't see any reason for maintaining an interpretation of 
"sensible_heat_flux" in standard names which conflicts with the normal usage.


regards,

Martin

________________________________
From: CF-metadata <[email protected]> on behalf of Jonathan 
Gregory <[email protected]>
Sent: 01 July 2018 18:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CF-metadata] Final 17 terms for CMIP6 LS3MIP: Heat flux into snowpack

Dear Alison and Martin

> tendency_of_thermal_energy_content_of_surface_snow_due_to_rainfall_temperature_excess_above_freezing

I think this  suggestion of Alison's is very good, to describe the rainfall
temperature flux as a change in heat content due to X rather than as the
problematic X heat flux. Thanks.

> inward_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
> outward_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
> OR
> incoming_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
> outgoing_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel.

I prefer the latter pair still, but I don't mind.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to