Dear Alison and all,

I support Martin's proposal 
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/020666.html to add

indian_pacific_ocean
atlantic_arctic_ocean

to the list of standard regions labels.

best regards,
Karl

On 11/21/18 1:40 PM, Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC wrote:
> Dear Jim,
>
>
> sorry, I stand corrected. Thank you for the detailed explanation.
>
>
> The conformance statements looks to be in error.
>
>
> Is there a clear rule for what makes a valid set of flag_values when used in 
> conjunction with flag_masks?
>
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jim Biard <[email protected]>
> Sent: 21 November 2018 20:50
> To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP); [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values allowed?
>
>
> Martin,
>
> The two subfields are independent. You can have very bad quality data and 
> very bad weather at the same time. And that's how the flag masks and flag 
> values are supposed to work. The mask splits off bit regions that are 
> independent of one another. There is no ambiguity.
>
> The possible options and the values masked by the flag masks of 3 (binary 
> 0011) and 12 (binary 1100) are:
>
> Weather Quality
>          Binary Value
>          Binary value & 3
>          Binary value & 12
>
> very bad
>          very bad
>          0000
>          0
>          0
>
> very bad
>          bad
>          0001
>          1
>          0
>
> very bad
>          good
>          0010
>          2
>          0
>
> very bad
>          very good
>          0011
>          3
>          0
>
> bad     very bad        0100
>          0
>          4
>
> bad     bad     0101
>          1
>          4
>
> bad     good    0110
>          2
>          4
>
> bad     very good       0111
>          3
>          4
>
> good    very bad        1000
>          0
>          8
>
> good    bad     1001
>          1
>          8
>
> good    good    1010
>          2
>          8
>
> good
>          very good       1011
>          3
>          8
>
> very good       very bad        1100
>          0
>          12
>
> very good       bad     1101
>          1
>          12
>
> very good       good    1110
>          2
>          12
>
> very good       very good       1111
>          3
>          12
>
>
> Grace and peace,
>
> Jim
>
> On 11/21/18 12:03 PM, Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC wrote:
>
> Hello Jim, Julien,
>
>
> I'm not sure .. I think the conformance might be right here and your 
> flag_values should be 0,1,2,3, 4, 8,12,16, and flag_masks 3,3,3,3,28,28,28,28
>
>
> If, for instance, you very_bad_quality and very_bad_weather, then "var" 
> should have value 4 = '00100000` in binary. Masked with 3 (11000000) gives 
> zero, and masked with 28 (00111000) gives 4. Re-using the zero value would 
> make zero ambiguous, so you need to start the 2nd sequence at 4.
>
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> ________________________________
> From: CF-metadata 
> <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> 
> on behalf of Jim Biard <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: 20 November 2018 16:51:24
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values allowed?
>
>
> Julien,
>
> That's fine. The conformance document probably needs a better statement of 
> the requirement when flag masks are used.
>
> Grace and peace,
>
> Jim
>
> On 11/20/18 11:40 AM, Julien Demaria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to define a flags variable defining like that:
> var:flag_masks = 3, 3, 3, 3, 12, 12, 12, 12 ;
> var:flag_values = 0, 1, 2, 3,   0,    4,  8, 12 ;
> var:flag_meanings = “very_bad_quality       bad_quality        good_quality   
>      very_good_quality
>                                              very_bad_weather    bad_weather  
>   good_weather    very_good_weather” ;
>
> I understand from http://cfconventions.org/Conformance/conformance.html that 
> it is not allowed to use several time the same value (here zero) in 
> flag_values:
>
> Requirements:
>
> ·         The flag_values attribute values must be mutually exclusive among 
> the set of flag_values attribute values defined for that variable.
> So it means that for each new “bits combination” in the flags definition we 
> lost one of the combination because we cannot use zero more than one time?
> Do you confirm this? What is the reason?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Julien
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>
> --
> [CICS-NC] <http://www.cicsnc.org/><http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc><http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>     
>   Jim Biard
> Research Scholar
> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC 
> <http://cicsnc.org/><http://cicsnc.org/>
> North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/><http://ncsu.edu/>
> NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information 
> <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/><http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
> formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center
> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
> e: 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
> o: +1 828 271 4900
>
> Connect with us on Facebook for 
> climate<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate><https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate>
>  and ocean and 
> geophysics<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo><https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo>
>  information, and follow us on Twitter at 
> @NOAANCEIclimate<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate><https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate>
>  and 
> @NOAANCEIocngeo<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo><https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>.
>
>
>
> --
> [CICS-NC] <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>       Jim Biard
> Research Scholar
> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
> North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
> NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
> formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center
> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
> e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> o: +1 828 271 4900
>
> Connect with us on Facebook for 
> climate<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and 
> geophysics<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow 
> us on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and 
> @NOAANCEIocngeo<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to