Hi Steve,

The issue is more that CF allows more freedom in the choice of units than many 
people expect from a "fraction".


A second problem, I think the problem is that I didn't explain the issue 
clearly. In the CMIP data request we are specifying that variables with 
standard name "area_fraction" should be given as percentages. This is allowed 
by the CF convention: an "area_fraction" can be 0.5 or 50%. The reason that 
percentages are being used is because "area_fraction" is being used like the 
proportion of land covered in grass, and people are used to having these as 
percentages rather than fractions. It is all perfectly correct as far as the 
convention goes, but people often interpret the use of "area_fraction" for a 
percentage as an error.


Given that we have the framework of allowing flexibility in the choice of 
units, I feel it would be better to avoid having the term "fraction" in the 
standard name, given that it is often interpreted as implying a specific choice 
for the units.


regards,

Martin


________________________________
From: Steven Emmerson <[email protected]>
Sent: 30 January 2019 21:37
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Cc: CF-metadata ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: 
area_fraction

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:54 PM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I'm afraid I don't understand your comment. When I search for "fraction" in the 
NIST document I find it defined as being a ratio, which is inconsistent with 
the current CF usage. The CF standard name concept "area_fraction" is not what 
NIST or others understand as a "fraction". I'm suggesting a change to remove 
this inconsistency.

Unless we're talking past one another, I'll have to disagree.  The NIST unit 
for "mass fraction" is "1" -- even though it's a ratio. A fraction can be 
represented many ways. "1:2", "1/2", and "0.5" all represent the same fraction, 
for example.

Does the CF convention require a particular representation for a fraction?

Regards,
Steve Emmerson
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to