Hi Steve,
yes, but I was suggesting a change in the standard name ... you seemed to be suggesting not using it, which would leave variables without a standard name. regards, Martin ________________________________ From: Steven Emmerson <emmer...@ucar.edu> Sent: 31 January 2019 18:27 To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP); CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu) Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name: area_fraction Martin, On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:32 AM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk>> wrote: In the interests of clarity, could you say why the option I've proposed is not in your list? I'm sorry. I thought you proposed not using the word "fraction", so that, for example, "area_fraction" would become something like "relative_area". Regards, Steve Emmerson _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata