This message came from the CF Trac system.  Do not reply.  Instead, enter your 
comments in the CF Trac system at http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/.

#107: CF Data Model 1.7
-----------------------------+------------------------------
  Reporter:  markh           |      Owner:  cf-conventions@…
      Type:  task            |     Status:  new
  Priority:  medium          |  Milestone:
 Component:  cf-conventions  |    Version:
Resolution:                  |   Keywords:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
\
\
\
\
\
\

Comment (by davidhassell):

 Replying to [comment:59 markh]:

 Dear Mark, Jim,

 > Replying to [comment:56 biard]:
 >
 > > I get the feeling that your effort to put formula_terms and
 grid_mapping together in one construct definition may be what's making
 things awkward.
 >
 > I agree with you Jim, I think this is awkward.

 > The functionality of CF-NetCDF formula_terms and grid_mappings may be
 simpler and clearer in the model if they are defined separately; they are
 quite different.

 Ok. We should discuss this! I think that fundamentally they are the same,
 which why they should not be separated in the ''logical'' data model

 CF-netCDF grid_mapping and formula_terms both provide information that
 indicate the location of the data, hence they can be described by the same
 construct.

 > Could we limit our scope in this case to the definition of frames of
 reference which coordinates may be defined with respect to?  I feel it
 would be clearer and easier for others to use this way.

 Apologies, I'm not sure what you mean, here.

 > I think ''coordinate reference system'' is a commonly used term for this
 in other communities which may aid communication, but if ''georeference''
 is a preferred label, then I think it is usable.

 One reason that we didn't use the phrase "coordinate reference system
 (CRS)" is because it means different things to different people - it is
 not a well defined term across all communities. I'm glad that you find
 "georeference" ok.

 Another is that a georeference construct is not, according to some
 definitions (such as ISO 19123, Geographic information -Schema for
 coverage geometry and functions) a CRS. (An ISO 19123 CRS is actually
 defined by a subset of the information contained in a georeference
 construct taken with the coordinate constructs to which it relates.)

 All the best,

 David
\
\
\

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:60>
CF Metadata <http://kitt.llnl.gov/>
CF Metadata
This message came from the CF Trac system.  To unsubscribe, without 
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to 
"[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your 
message.

Reply via email to