Mark - thank you very much for taking the time to explain this "A cf_axis is not the same concept as a crs_wkt_axis" is a fact that I had not realized.
The text as you wrote it is indeed fine, but I'm not sure what the difference between *coordinate_variable* and *coordinates_variable* is (https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/224/files#diff-0eab4e85fe4c323f70ce4bce0229dbe6L210-R212). I presume that there is no requirement for the CF checker to get involved with this, as it ignores the content of CRS-WKT attributes, so there's no need to pursue the case when there are more coordinate variables are listed by the grid mapping attribute than CRS-WKT axes. So, I'm happy with this proposal - pending on what the extra _s_ really means in my question above! Thank you again to everyone who helped me understand more about WKT - much appreciated. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/223#issuecomment-572111929 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
