Hi @davidhassell you're welcome
> The text as you wrote it is indeed fine, but I'm not sure what the difference > between coordinate_variable and coordinates_variable I have introduced the `s` into `coordinates_variable` in the text to try and contrast, to state more explicitly that this word is different from the widely used `coordinate variable` concept, which is widespread in the conventions document. I hope that this may help to avoid the interpretation that this is only for the `coordinate variable` concept but is trying to refer to any netCDF variable which may contain some coordinate values, be they auxiliary or not. I'm not wedded to this change, and I think the doc is okay as it is now, but this change may just help to make a reader think 'is this a different concept, should I read this again carefully'. As the information is contained within these two proximate sections in the conventions doc, I thought it might be a worthwhile editorial tweak. mark -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/223#issuecomment-572120008 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
