Re CHAR vs STRING, the netcdf C API method calls one 
[text](https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/group__attributes.html#ga83c961529fa27b1768528e5d27cc3eb4)
 and other other 
[string](https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/group__attributes.html#ga0d66350856a4a6dd3f459fd092937c27).
 Do we want to use that language at all in whatever text is developed?

Be aware that the netcdf python library will [force the 
use](https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/pull/389) of strings for netcdf4 
files if it sees unicode points outside of ASCII.

Also be aware that LATIN-1 is not compatible with UTF-8 with code points above 
127. The ISO working group maintaining these "legacy" standards (ISO-8859-n, 
where n=1 is LATIN-1) doesn't even exist anymore...

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/141#issuecomment-599672675

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
[email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to