@albenson-usgs This is a separate answer to your response to @davidhassell and myself. Vocabulary search engines in the past decade have been designed to search by default both labels and descriptions. Therefore our suggestion to extend the Standard Name descriptions should draw the attention of your hypothetical data manager to the fact that biological_taxon_name and scientificName are the same thing.
I'm not sure who is watching this thread, but having been through the Trac 99 debate I know there are people who would voice strong opinions against your suggested Standard Name label change. CF is a standard based on physics that requires other domains to explain themselves with great clarity. As a specialist in biogeochemical semantics this is something I've learned over the years! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/309#issuecomment-731375848 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
