Yes, that might be a good way to encode the information. What I wanted to say is this: I find it very plausible that in a national weather service a group sits together and decides to code their station data using variable names `tas_station-name` with a number of non ascii letters in the station names. Furthermore, that would appear to be perfectly valid CF.
So I think being more explicit about what is meant by "letter" would be good, even if that means saying that only ascii letters are allowed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/237#issuecomment-732258060 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
