> I also agree with your deprecation of the year 0 climatological convention, > but it is stronger than what section 7.4 currently says, which is, "We do not > recommend this convention." That sounds the same, but it's not currently > noted in the conformance document for section 7.4. Therefore I think we must > either not deprecate it in 4.4, or deprecate it in 7.4, to be consistent.
Agreed. I reverted to "not recommended". Please see new wording in #315. Your further suggestions are welcome. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/298*issuecomment-810642965__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!g3LB892p3JD0_Ps1YVE1kvnwt64YhVly0MUswYQmMccs5HFU2vep2DjJVa6jngI8UTGDan8b0kU$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
