Dear @ethanrd When we added that part to the rules, this situation had never arisen. I believe this is the first time. As I said in https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/314__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!gXTk5QBGsbA12sSQTiTjm1mGmUOpQXQ4VLG73uwNJSLNgfFPR7Up-83LY9Ny3M8-P02D37QD4DY$ , I think that the aim of deprecation should be to discourage faulty data from being written, and it should be the minimal recommendation that would achieve that effect.
Cheers Jonathan -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/328*issuecomment-845924195__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!gXTk5QBGsbA12sSQTiTjm1mGmUOpQXQ4VLG73uwNJSLNgfFPR7Up-83LY9Ny3M8-P02D15Dd_uY$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
