@zklaus has made the following comment on the PR > Perhaps this is a good opportunity to update the second udunits.dat link in > the following line 217 as well.
> I also wonder if we should be explicit in whether CF follows udunits in the > definitions of year and month. The way these two paragraphs are written, the > reader might come away with the impression that we are only warning of > potential misinterpretation by some other software, whereas my understanding > so far is that we adopt the udunits definition, albeit begrudgingly. But > perhaps my understand is wrong or you would prefer to address this in a > separate issue? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/298*issuecomment-873056870__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!msZZnzADWvMt9e6LOkB-i7ywCmHNYOtcg2RnV_2yrz_2414wDg642R5BAJEEJxI8VVsSiGuw8lk$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
