I think it's good when CF files can be interpreted, ideally both by humans and computers, and ideally unambiguously. That means it should be easy, for example, to color in in the five pointed star posted by @davidhassell above, which region should be used for averaging over this geometry. It seems that @Dave-Allured's position amounts to saying this should not only not be easy, it should not be well-defined because that would be overstepping CF's mandate.
Most likely, I misunderstand, but I certainly think that would be an unfortunate interpretation of CF's role. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/354*issuecomment-1072573602__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!juD1_UrmrAv_uFqgHOBueO3vkJQLE2LlhswnWMbeQuFOmVU0KrexnW1O7RDot5JIZEHyxdV0Ym8$ You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/354/[email protected]> This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
