And if I'd had enough caffiene, I would have realized who was writing,
and that you're at least as good at this as I am.

If I can think of anything, I'll let you know.  I may need some time to
wake up, first, though.  :-)

Stupid Monday.

--Ben

Pascal Peters wrote:

> I know that. The way of changing it to multiline mode is putting (?m) at
> the beginning of the regexp. My question was: Why does it behave
> differently in my 2 examples?
> My question was not how to solve my problem, it's solved already using
> look ahead.
>
> Pascal
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Sent: maandag 21 juni 2004 15:42
>  > To: CF-RegEx
>  > Subject: Re: Is multiline regexp broken?
>  >
>  > IIRC, CFMX by default doesn't use a multi-line parsing
>  > format.  $ is end-of-string.  For some reason, I think that
>  > there's a way to change that, but I can't remember what it
>  > is.  In any case, you could always replace $ with something
>  > like [#chr(10)##chr(13)#]{1,2} which is less convenient, but
>  > would generally work.
>  >
>  > --Ben
>  >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to