> I am going to setup a Win2000 server today. It sounds like the NTFS is
the
> way to go if you are using IIS. Has anyone had experience switching to
> this? It sounds pretty simple. That is why I am a little bit worried.
It is actually as simple as you have been lead to believe.
> Any advice for staying with FAT versus NTFS?
Not on 2000. There were a few good arguments for FAT partitions in NT but
those have all been negated with 2000 since you can boot to a 2000 drive in
console mode when you no longer have a working system and since 2000 doesn't
need to be partitioned to be installed on larger drives.
NTFS has quite a few advantages, not the least of which are permissions and
better use of larger (2 Gig+) drivers.
Benjamin S. Rogers
Web Developer, c4.net
Voice: (508) 240-0051
Fax: (508) 240-0057
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
