CF5 is *NOT* written in Java. Neo, or CF6 will be, but CF5 is definitely 100% not written in Java.
I would say though, that there is a good chance at least part of it was CF anyways. Some of the memory management in CF5 was changed to cause CF to "give back" more RAM. Some info on that should be listed in the CF5 release notes I think... The ODBC driver upgrade *could* have also contributed... I guess this supports MM's argument that everyone should "upgrade to CF5!" and all your problems will go away. (well not quite all, but most).. -Cameron -------------------- Cameron Childress elliptIQ Inc. p.770.460.1035.232 f.770.460.0963 -- http://www.neighborware.com America's Leading Community Network Software > -----Original Message----- > From: Artecom Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:56 AM > To: CF-Server > Subject: Fw: Problems like this everyone should have > > > Hi, > > It's verry interesting but... who care ?? > > No, i'm kidding ! > > I think it's not the ODBC drivers > It could be win2000 or CF5 and the most realistik is CF5 'cos it > is written > in Java and java have the garbage collector to free the "unused" > used memory > ! But it is also possible that Win2000 has an increased performance memory > management. > and the both are "responsable" of your "problem" > > So, do i reply to your question ? > > P.S. Sorry 4 the bad engligh ! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim McAtee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:15 AM > Subject: Problems like this everyone should have > > > > Two days ago we replaced a CF server with a newer, latest > greatest, etc., > > etc. The new machine is running Windows 2000 Server and CF5 > Professional. > > Most datasources are Access (I believe using MDAC 2.51 or later), a few > > using dbase (Merant driver) and a few using MS SQL Server 2000. > > > > The old server (NT4, CF4.01, MDAC 1.5 or so) had 512MB of RAM and > routinely > > passed 420MB in memory usage). We cycled the CF Application Server > nightly > > and that freed up at least 100MB in memory each night. > > > > The new server has 2GB (that's 2 GIGAbytes) of RAM. RAM right now is > > insanely inexpenive, even more so when I built the machine several weeks > > ago. So, now what do I see in terms of memory usage? Somewhere betwee > > 250MB and 290MB, never higher. I don't see the slow, gradual > increase in > > memory consumption that I used to see. Who knows what to credit - newer > > ODBC drivers, ColdFusion5, or Windows 2000 itself. Whatever the case, > it's > > welcome. What I'd like, however, is a means of turning all that unused > RAM > > into increased performance. I've already got the CF cache set to > 128MBytes, > > which should be overkill for something like 10MBytes worth of > source files > > for the all CF templates themselves. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > BTW, we had our single busiest day today, peaking at over 229kBytes per > > second (in a five minute sample) of outbound traffic from this single CF > > server. It hardly broke a sweat. > > > > Thanks, > > Jim > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Macromedia ColdFusion 5 Training from the Source Step by Step ColdFusion http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0201758474/houseoffusion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
