Don't forget Apache is still considered "Beta" on WinNT. That said I think it
beats the pants off of IIS. It loads into about 5 MB of memory compared to the
30MB IIS seems to use. My only problem is the directory browsing, it lines up
all the files and directories alphabetically as opposed to lining up the
directories then files... probably just haven't read all the docs yet.
: David Nesbitt
: Web Production Specialist
: (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't have any statistics but I've experimented with both and Apache seems
> to be the clear winner on NT.
> > Has anyone done any testing as to whether CF runs
> > faster/more efficient as an Apache module or an IIS plugin
> > (both being NT
> > solutions)?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
