Right. but this is Apache vs IIS as just webservers. I'm more
concerned about the Apache CF module VS IIS CF plugin.
On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, cragrat wrote:
> Don't forget Apache is still considered "Beta" on WinNT. That said I think it
> beats the pants off of IIS. It loads into about 5 MB of memory compared to the
> 30MB IIS seems to use. My only problem is the directory browsing, it lines up
> all the files and directories alphabetically as opposed to lining up the
> directories then files... probably just haven't read all the docs yet.
>
>
> : David Nesbitt
> : Web Production Specialist
> : (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > I don't have any statistics but I've experimented with both and Apache seems
> > to be the clear winner on NT.
>
> > > Has anyone done any testing as to whether CF runs
> > > faster/more efficient as an Apache module or an IIS plugin
> > > (both being NT
> > > solutions)?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
> To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
>message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
>
Tariq Ahmed - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ 6308515
TIBCO Finance Technology - Web Group - Senior Web Engineer
Work: 650-461-3472 Pager: 800-759-8888x1702632 Fax: 650-461-3003
3375 Hillview Avenue. Palo Alto, CA. 94304.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
