Wow, thanks. I guess I will just have to do like I do with everything else
and join up on that list and check it out. Do you have the URL where I can
go to sign up. From there I will just read and play and see what comes of
it. Thanks again.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick & Loretta Pioch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 4:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fusebox or not Fusebox that is the question...
>
>
> Bill,
> You are totally right. I think the biggest point to Fusebox is
> that its *A* standard. How many people, groups, companies do you
> know that code without any or sparce standards?
>
> Why does it have to be Fusebox? It doesn't...but if you don't
> have a standard of your own, why re-invent the wheel when there's
> a pretty big Fusebox audience out there to utilize and
> learn from? Depending on how big your project/company is (or how
> fast you need your project done), I'd say Fusebox isn't a bad way
> to go...the list of people who use Fusebox seems to
> keep growing and growing, that it's not that hard to imagine
> putting out a job posting with Fusebox as a prerequisit (or a
> "big plus"). So you could hire someone in who already knows
> YOUR standard.
>
> What is Fusebox? It's a standard used by many Cold Fusion
> developers. It's a standard that allows you to easily separate
> out different functions of your application so that they are
> completely independent of the others...so programmer 1 can take
> this part of the app and develop it... programmer 2 can take that
> part and develop it...etc...without needing to know
> how the others are doing it. All they need to know is the list
> of fuses (actions).
>
> Why should you use it? If you have your own set of standards,
> GREAT! I'd argue there are lots of people/companies out there
> that DON'T but need to. But if you're looking for a
> standard that many other people know/understand, and one that
> allows easy independent-segmenting of your application, then
> Fusebox is worth looking into / trying out.
>
> Current documentation available *is* a little convoluted, and you
> need to do a small app yourself to really understand/get into the
> flow of Fusebox. Currently, on the Fusebox list,
> we are looking into ways of making the learning process of
> Fusebox much simpler and easier to understand.
>
> Hope this helps!
> -- Loretta Pioch
>
> Bill Killillay wrote:
>
> > Can't all of that be done by establishing standards for a project or all
> > projects. Why does it have to be Fusebox? I have been looking
> at Fusebox
> > and I guess that I am a bit confused as to what it is and why I
> should use
> > it over some other set of standards?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
> To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
