Your description is the nature of the argument historically -- ie.
irrational. My bias is that the source of the argument may well be a
random/abstract versus a concrete/linear thinking prediliction. Anyone who
needs breadcrumbs to find their way out of the woods loves well-applied
frames. "well-applied" -- that's the rub. Many early examples were
exercises in frames rather than well-designed navigation and presentation.
I can tell you that frames were created on the 1st day t contain everything
else.
don
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Kaigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 9:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Frames vs NoFrames
Hello,
First, let me say I am pro frames. I believe that 97.9% of all people who
use my business application will use either netscape or ie. I have never
found a limitation that has prevented me from using frames.
Second, I am codeveloping a new site and the other developer does not like
frames but has not given me a valid reason for this dislike.
Third and final, what is your opinion of frames? likes dislikes? and have
you found any limitations to using frames. You can use the application
browser as an excuse if you can prove that there is more than 5% use of
other browsers in the business arena.
Thanks in advance.
Bill Kaigler
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
