CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under Win2k boxes: http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo rmance_brief.pdf
Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It looks that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, specially on templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox ones), to the just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes 100% of my CPU)... I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's a pain in the ass wait CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify it. In a production environment this is acceptable but in a development environment is realy bad! It becames painless if you use 1Gb processors or faster but... Well, does anybody has the same complain? []'s Alex ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
