Here is a way to pre compile your pages. Call the file MX, then MX c:\inetpub\wwwroot\whatever
@setlocal set NEO_INSTALL=c:\cfusionMX set PATH=%NEO_INSTALL%\runtime\bin;%PATH% java -classpath %NEO_INSTALL%\lib\cfusion.jar coldfusion.tools.Compiler -webroot %NEO_INSTALL%\wwwroot %* @endlocal Robert Everland III Web Developer Extraordinaire Dixon Ticonderoga Company http://www.dixonusa.com -----Original Message----- From: Alex Hubner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under Win2k boxes: http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo rmance_brief.pdf Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It looks that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, specially on templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox ones), to the just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes 100% of my CPU)... I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's a pain in the ass wait CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify it. In a production environment this is acceptable but in a development environment is realy bad! It becames painless if you use 1Gb processors or faster but... Well, does anybody has the same complain? []'s Alex ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
