I have successfully been able to achieve great performance out of WDDX intensive applications using CF 4.5, 5, and MX.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:15 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > Stace, > No..Not Client Scope. That would be a real big problem..(client > scope WDDX)... if all this > turns out to be true....(WDDX Serialize - Deserialize) performance > in CFMX unless there > is an optmized way(cfmx) to code WDDX. Yea.. WDDX in client scope > is > great... > The App am dealing with...WDDX is written to the database for > Content MGMT, > i didnt code this.. am not sure.. why the developer used this > method..The data > is even redundant. > Have you had a chance to LOAD TEST any Client Scope WDDX in > CFMX..? > Curious? > Joe > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:10 PM > Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > Hey Joe I'm curious...these objects...are they wddx packets stored in > client > > scope which in turn is in your client variable datasource? > > > > Stace > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:54 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > Sean, > > I havent come to a final test result.. but i think we are > narrowing > > it > > down to the Complex Object(WDDX) returned from the data store > > that gets parsed out WDDX2CFML.. > > Custom Tags are probably running ok/fast.. probably its the WDDX > > parsing..in CFMX that causes the CPU to run 80-90%... Atleast we > > are seeing a pattern here with tests. > > I will try to write case/result...end of this week or so. > > Is it possible that you can find out.. > > How the Java Implementation of WDDX2CFML has changed in CFMX? > > Any WDDX implementation changes(Not in docs) will be helpful. > > Thanks > > Joe > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:00 AM > > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 07:26 , Joe Eugene wrote: > > > > Do you know of any internal WDDX implementation differences > > > > between > > > > CFMX and CF5.0 .. CFMX > > > > > > Er, yes, it was written in C/C++ in CF5 and it's been rewritten in > Java > in > > > CFMX. As has everything else. Read my lips Joe: CFMX is a complete > > rewrite. > > > > > > > What does #1 mean? > > > > > > I don't know. I don't use JavaScript with queries so I don't know what > the > > > behavior was or how it changed. > > > > > > > If WDDX data is Stored in a DB and output using custom > tags.. > is > > > > there any internal CFMX > > > > implementation that would degrade performance compared to > CF5.0? > > > > > > Well, custom tag invocations are faster in CFMX than in CF5. I have no > > > idea about WDDX. Do you *think* it is slower? Have you written a test > case > > > and *proved* there is a noticeable difference? Why don't you try it > for > > > yourself. > > > > > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > > > > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > > > -- Margaret Atwood > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
