Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
To be absolutely sure I installed CF 5 on the same machine as CF MX is
running. Next I ran the test with 3 files of different sizes. The files
are available online [1] for anybody who wants to try this himself, but
since they are Base64 encoded the actual content shouldn't matter.
Average over multiple runs (CPU at 100% all the time):
CF 5 MX
9 KB 40 50
24 KB 240 3300
84 KB 6700 130000
Apparently size does matter. I'll enter it in the bug form :(
Jochem
http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file0.tst
http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file1.tst
http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file2.tst
______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
