On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote: > Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
Thank you for (finally) posting some example code and data that we can try out. I'll try to have a look at this tomorrow (although, as I say, I don't have CF5 to test against). I expect other folks here will now try out your WDDX packet on both systems and see what happens. I'd still recommend you actually put some getTickCount() calls around the code and report back the times on both CF5 and CFMX - as several people have (repeatedly) said here, the response time is really more important than the CPU usage. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
