> :hmm: That is interesting. I don't like un-named scopes. I wish > someone at Macromedia took a little time to document this stuff. > I thought the variable was automatically put into the this scope. I > have to agree with Hal on this one. That is a kludge. The scope should > have a name. A scope named private would have been a better option. > Actually you can scope private variables using the variables scope. Although there is a bug associated with using the variables scope, so it is better to use no scope for now.
> Allow me to bang my head on the desk. I was using the two terms > interchangeably. > I doubled checked my OO book and it uses the term overloading > exclusively. What exactly is overriding, then? > Overriding simply means to override a method in the super class. If you inherit a method named foo from your super class and create your own method named foo then you are overriding the foo method of the super class. > You're right. When did this creep into the product? I'd bet my right > arm that this was not supported during the beta cycle? > Been there all along. -Matt ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
