I don't know how more explicit I can get. Your getX method is returning
a reference to a private data member. Once you have a reference there is
nothing stopping you from changing the private data. Again, this is the
same as in Java.

public class Salary
{
        private int salary = 100;

        public int getSalary()
        {
                return salary;
        }
}

Try it and see!

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFC theory
> 
> I don't think you saw what I was getting at, here is a very explicit
> example:
> 
> <cfset foo = CreateObject("component", "Salary")>
> <cfset variables.salary = "123">
> <cfoutput>#foo.getSalary()#</cfoutput>
> 
> getSalary will return 123
> 
> here is an even worse example:
> 
> foo.cfc:
> <cfcomponent>
>       <cfset variables.x = "100">
>       <cffunction name="getX">
>               <cfreturn variables.x>
>       </cffunction>
>       <cffunction name="setX">
>               <cfargument name="x">
>               <cfset variables.x = arguments.x>
>       </cffunction>
> </cfcomponent>
> 
> test.cfm:
> <cfset foo1 = CreateObject("component", "foo")>
> <cfset foo2 = CreateObject("component", "foo")>
> <cfset foo1.setX(1)>
> <cfset foo2.setX(2)>
> <cfoutput>#foo1.getX()#</cfoutput>
> 
> take a wild guess what this outputs... 2!
> 
> not my idea of private.
> 
> -pete
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 6:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFC theory
> 
> 
> The variable is private. However, when you use the getSalary method
you
> return a reference to the private variable. This is the same in Java
if
> you declare a variable as private and have a public "getter" that
> returns a reference to it.
> 
> Matt Liotta
> President & CEO
> Montara Software, Inc.
> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> V: 415-577-8070
> F: 415-341-8906
> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 3:40 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: CFC theory
> >
> > > Anything placed in the variables scope is private; bug or not.
> >
> > Depends on how you look at it, sure it's private in that you can't
> access
> > cfcInstance.salary
> >
> > But you could do something like this...
> >
> > <cfset variables.salary = foo.getSalary()>
> > <cfset variables.salary = DollarFormat(variables.salary)>
> > <cfoutput>#variables.salary#</cfoutput>
> >
> > and you will change the value of the data member inside the CFC. I
> don't
> > see
> > how you can call that behavior private, because it goes against all
> the
> > reasons you would want to have private access.
> >
> > Though I agree with you if you are saying that as long as the
> developer
> > using your CFC is aware of the bug, then you can pretend that
> variables
> > scope is private, and just avoid writing code like the code above.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to