Outside of the Package might be right.. but i havent created any packages.
> > now take the code.. compile and run it.. you should get the
method
> > called..
>
> No you won't because your class is not public
It compiled and ran the code succesfully with (class Simple) on java Simple
// no public but CFObject didnt like this.
I am not sure.. what your doing.... or are we on the same page here?
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: CFObject in CFMX
> On Sunday, September 8, 2002, at 06:01 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > I am not sure if this is the case.. did u see the second post i made
to
> > Matt?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Example
> > class Simple { // note no public/private should default
to
> > public in Java
>
> No, it is *not* public by default. Such a class is *not* accessible by an
> external system. Java requires that you specify "public class Simple" if
> you want "Simple" to be accessed outside of that package.
>
> > now take the code.. compile and run it.. you should get the
method
> > called..
>
> No you won't because your class is not public.
>
> > remove the main() and call it with <CFOBJECT> it starts to
> > complain...
>
> Of course. You took out a *public* method that accessed the class
> *from*within* and didn't leave any public interface.
>
> > its a real pain to start and stop the server in development.
>
> /coldfusion stop
> /coldfusion start
>
> Takes a few seconds. Not much of a pain at all. But I agree that
> configuring hot load would make it even easier.
>
> > Well is hot load implemented
> > for CF classes.. i mean how is that implemented in CFMX?
>
> CF checks the timestamp on the *source* .cfm / .cfc file and if it is
> newer that the version it has already compiled, it compiles it (to Java
> and then compiles the .java to .class) and explicitly reloads the .class
> files. It can do this because it starts the process off by accessing a
> file and can do each step explicitly. This is very different from having a
> running Java system and dropping a new .class file in - the JVM does not
> normally look at the timestamps every time it invokes a class / method.
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
