This makes sence... thanks.. Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Gilchrist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:09 AM Subject: RE: CFObject in CFMX
> If you tested this with a test program that was in the same directory, > it is in the same package by default. The default access allows the > calls to be accessed by other members of the same package. > > CFMX won't see the CFObject call as a call from within the same package > and therefore fails. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:42 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFObject in CFMX > > Outside of the Package might be right.. but i havent created any > packages. > > > now take the code.. compile and run it.. you should get the > method > > > called.. > > > > No you won't because your class is not public > > It compiled and ran the code succesfully with (class Simple) on java > Simple > // no public but CFObject didnt like this. > I am not sure.. what your doing.... or are we on the same page here? > > Joe > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:15 AM > Subject: Re: CFObject in CFMX > > > > On Sunday, September 8, 2002, at 06:01 , Joe Eugene wrote: > > > I am not sure if this is the case.. did u see the second post i > made > to > > > Matt? > > > > Yes. > > > > > Example > > > class Simple { // note no public/private should > default > to > > > public in Java > > > > No, it is *not* public by default. Such a class is *not* accessible by > an > > external system. Java requires that you specify "public class Simple" > if > > you want "Simple" to be accessed outside of that package. > > > > > now take the code.. compile and run it.. you should get the > method > > > called.. > > > > No you won't because your class is not public. > > > > > remove the main() and call it with <CFOBJECT> it starts to > > > complain... > > > > Of course. You took out a *public* method that accessed the class > > *from*within* and didn't leave any public interface. > > > > > its a real pain to start and stop the server in development. > > > > /coldfusion stop > > /coldfusion start > > > > Takes a few seconds. Not much of a pain at all. But I agree that > > configuring hot load would make it even easier. > > > > > Well is hot load implemented > > > for CF classes.. i mean how is that implemented in CFMX? > > > > CF checks the timestamp on the *source* .cfm / .cfc file and if it is > > newer that the version it has already compiled, it compiles it (to > Java > > and then compiles the .java to .class) and explicitly reloads the > class > > files. It can do this because it starts the process off by accessing a > > file and can do each step explicitly. This is very different from > having a > > running Java system and dropping a new .class file in - the JVM does > not > > normally look at the timestamps every time it invokes a class / > method. > > > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > > -- Margaret Atwood > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
