CFMX Server side redirect...
<cfscript>
GetPageContext().forward("Somepage.cfm?myid=7"); // works similar to asp3.0
server.redirect(whatever.asp)
</cfscript>

Yes.. the server redirects/passes/controls the flow of the application.
Cookies should work fine.
Some of the new CFMX books advise this method.. but i think.. the URL doesnt
change.. eventhough
the redirected page get executed.

Joe



>From: "Tony Weeg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: cflocation vs. server side redirect.
>Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:39:14 -0400
>
>ok, now I have heard that one is better than the other....
>that's fine, but whats the code for the server side redirect
>that we can use inside cfscript tags?
>
>also, in using the server side redirect, can we set cookies
>on action pages, that at the end of the page use a server
>side redirect? as opposed to the problem with cflocation at
>the end of an action page, and not being able to set cookies
>correctly cause of the redirect?
>
>thanks
>
>..tony
>
>Tony Weeg
>Senior Web Developer
>Information System Design
>Navtrak, Inc.
>Fleet Management Solutions
>www.navtrak.net
>410.548.2337
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: iif usage
>
>
>IIF has its place. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I thought I
>read on this list weeks ago that with MX, IIF was just as fast as CFIF.
>All languages have their fans in terms of language specifics and what to
>use and what not to use... if you do not like something, don't use it.
>If you like it and and the performance from your method is the best it
>can be, use it. So.........
>
>My 2 cents.
>
>Mike
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:17 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: iif usage
>
>
>Good (humor) Sean...~! I agree there are bad practices...
>(evaluate,cflocation, variable prefixes, spaghetti code and some others)
>but i dont think you should include IIF in them...
>
>Joe
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:59 PM
>Subject: Re: iif usage
>
>
> > On Sunday, September 8, 2002, at 09:33 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > > I dont agree with Sean or Dave...
> >
> > That doesn't surprise me Joe :)
> >
> > > i dont think IIF is necessary but its
> > > a very useful function ... "IF USED PROPERLY"
> >
> > I didn't say it wasn't *useful* - I just said it was bad practice and
> > could always be avoided.
> >
> > > Many of you guys dont agree.. but i personally prefer using IIF and
>i
> > > use it only when necessary... a good example would be...table row
>colors.
> > > ..
> >
> > It is NEVER necessary. You even admit that above!
> >
> > > i dont use the above for complex logic...write cfscript blocks of
>code...
> > > i am not very fond of <cfif> contructs...
> >
> > But you can structure your code to be concise without iif(). Since you
> > want alternating colors, you should see that rownum mod 2 will give
> > alternating 1, 0, 1, 0 values. So you could construct a two-element
>array
> > containing the colors you want - do this above the loop over the table
> > rows - and then each row just accesses the appropriate element of the
> > array.
> >
> > The main benefit of this approach is that it keeps the color
>specification
> > separate from the row logic instead of being embedded in the table and
>it
> > also scales easily to alternately through more colors or alternating
>on
> > blocks of rows.
> >
> > And of course it doesn't use iif() which is a big plus in my book.
> >
> > If you want to use iif() instead of <cfif>, that's up to you. Just
>don't
> > ask me for a job (or a reference)... :)
> >
> > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
> >
> > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> > -- Margaret Atwood
> >
> >
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to