Well.. looks like i have to post the comments as well..
Java comments ("//"single line "/*" multi line or blocks of code)
CFScript comment ( same as Java "//"single line "/*multi line or blocks
of code*/)
SQL Server (-- single line, double line /* some comment code */)
Javascript (same as Java "//"single line "/*" multi line or blocks of
code)
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Brocx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: cflocation vs. server side redirect.
> No tony, The part "// works similar to " Does not have to be there. It's
> commented piece of code. Anything after // in a cfscript won't be run,
> it's just commenting.
> Ken
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: cflocation vs. server side redirect.
>
> <cfscript>
> GetPageContext().forward("Somepage.cfm?myid=7"); // works similar to
> asp3.0
> server.redirect(whatever.asp)
> </cfscript>
>
> so does this bit about "works similar" need to be there?
>
> I havent the faintest idea what was right or wrong in asp3.0
> and have seen this same snippet elsewhere...why does everyone
> always keep that line (works similar....) in there? or do both lines
> need to be in there?
>
> ps....thanks Joee and Bryan.
>
> .tony
>
> Tony Weeg
> Senior Web Developer
> Information System Design
> Navtrak, Inc.
> Fleet Management Solutions
> www.navtrak.net
> 410.548.2337
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joee Bastian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:04 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cflocation vs. server side redirect.
>
>
> CFMX Server side redirect...
> <cfscript>
> GetPageContext().forward("Somepage.cfm?myid=7"); // works similar to
> asp3.0
> server.redirect(whatever.asp)
> </cfscript>
>
> Yes.. the server redirects/passes/controls the flow of the application.
> Cookies should work fine.
> Some of the new CFMX books advise this method.. but i think.. the URL
> doesnt
> change.. eventhough
> the redirected page get executed.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> >From: "Tony Weeg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: cflocation vs. server side redirect.
> >Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:39:14 -0400
> >
> >ok, now I have heard that one is better than the other....
> >that's fine, but whats the code for the server side redirect
> >that we can use inside cfscript tags?
> >
> >also, in using the server side redirect, can we set cookies
> >on action pages, that at the end of the page use a server
> >side redirect? as opposed to the problem with cflocation at
> >the end of an action page, and not being able to set cookies
> >correctly cause of the redirect?
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >..tony
> >
> >Tony Weeg
> >Senior Web Developer
> >Information System Design
> >Navtrak, Inc.
> >Fleet Management Solutions
> >www.navtrak.net
> >410.548.2337
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: RE: iif usage
> >
> >
> >IIF has its place. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I thought I
> >read on this list weeks ago that with MX, IIF was just as fast as CFIF.
> >All languages have their fans in terms of language specifics and what
> to
> >use and what not to use... if you do not like something, don't use it.
> >If you like it and and the performance from your method is the best it
> >can be, use it. So.........
> >
> >My 2 cents.
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:17 PM
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: Re: iif usage
> >
> >
> >Good (humor) Sean...~! I agree there are bad practices...
> >(evaluate,cflocation, variable prefixes, spaghetti code and some
> others)
> >but i dont think you should include IIF in them...
> >
> >Joe
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:59 PM
> >Subject: Re: iif usage
> >
> >
> > > On Sunday, September 8, 2002, at 09:33 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > > > I dont agree with Sean or Dave...
> > >
> > > That doesn't surprise me Joe :)
> > >
> > > > i dont think IIF is necessary but its
> > > > a very useful function ... "IF USED PROPERLY"
> > >
> > > I didn't say it wasn't *useful* - I just said it was bad practice
> and
> > > could always be avoided.
> > >
> > > > Many of you guys dont agree.. but i personally prefer using IIF
> and
> >i
> > > > use it only when necessary... a good example would be...table row
> >colors.
> > > > ..
> > >
> > > It is NEVER necessary. You even admit that above!
> > >
> > > > i dont use the above for complex logic...write cfscript blocks of
> >code...
> > > > i am not very fond of <cfif> contructs...
> > >
> > > But you can structure your code to be concise without iif(). Since
> you
> > > want alternating colors, you should see that rownum mod 2 will give
> > > alternating 1, 0, 1, 0 values. So you could construct a two-element
> >array
> > > containing the colors you want - do this above the loop over the
> table
> > > rows - and then each row just accesses the appropriate element of
> the
> > > array.
> > >
> > > The main benefit of this approach is that it keeps the color
> >specification
> > > separate from the row logic instead of being embedded in the table
> and
> >it
> > > also scales easily to alternately through more colors or alternating
> >on
> > > blocks of rows.
> > >
> > > And of course it doesn't use iif() which is a big plus in my book.
> > >
> > > If you want to use iif() instead of <cfif>, that's up to you. Just
> >don't
> > > ask me for a job (or a reference)... :)
> > >
> > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
> > >
> > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> > > -- Margaret Atwood
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
