> Do you have NET, SQL Server Oracle installed on your 
> developer machine/

Yes, you can run all of those on a laptop. On my laptop, running Win2K
Server SP3, I have SQL Server 2000 and the .NET Framework, among other
things. I don't have Oracle installed right now, but several people here run
Oracle 8.1.7 on their laptops, just for fun.

> Are there free/reasonable developer versions of these 
> available.

Yes. You can download Oracle from the Oracle Technet site for free, for
development use (http://technet.oracle.com/). It requires some patience,
since it's a very slow download, and Oracle 9i for Windows is four CDs. You
can likewise download the .NET Framework and install it on any Windows 2000
machine for free - and that's all you really need for ASP.NET development.
(Visual Studio.NET is nice, but there's a free ASP.NET development tool
called WebMatrix available here: http://www.asp.net/.)

There's a developer version of SQL Server 2000, but it's still about $400 or
so, which isn't really that bad, but even there, you have alternatives. For
CF development, you can use MSDE, which is essentially SQL Server without
the Enterprise Manager console application:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/development/2000/MSDE2000.asp

> The reason I ask is I want a completely self-contained 
> environment on a laptop -- that I can use for development 
> and demonstration to clients.

In that case, I'd recommend Windows 2000 over Linux. There are several
reasons I'd make that recommendation. One is simply that you're less likely
to run into installation issues with your laptop - while Linux can be made
to run on most laptops, the manufacturers don't necessarily make it easy. To
take that one step farther, any gadgets that you want to hook up to your
laptop will generally be supported under Windows, but maybe not under Linux.


Another is familiarity - you and your clients are probably more familiar
with the Windows interface; since you're getting this to demo to clients,
they'll be looking right at it, and you won't have to answer stupid
questions like "where's the Start menu on this thing". This extends to
sharing files (Word docs, Powerpoint presentations, etc) with those clients.

Another is simply that there are more commercial applications generally
available on Windows - I can't think of one database diagrammer available
for Linux, for example. I won't argue that Windows is a better server
platform than Linux, but I think it's a more generally useful platform for
most laptop users.

But before you ditch OS X, you might just try running everything you need
within Virtual PC, on either a Windows or Linux virtual OS. I do this for
some things, and the performance isn't that bad for development purposes. On
occasion, I run two virtual OS sessions (both Windows 2000, usually) without
noticeable degradation in responses from services within those sessions. If
I recall correctly, you already have a copy of Virtual PC, so you might have
nothing to lose by trying this approach.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to