Sure, but it doesn't seem like optimizing this specific case is really going to help anyone in the real world.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:02 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: FW: Jsp Vs Cfm (CFMX) -- Test Code > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Matt Liotta wrote: > > > While the above is closer to the work the CF version has to do, it is > > still missing some casting overhead. This is because in CFMX all simple > > CF variables are stored using coldfusion.runtime.Variable, which > > actually stores the value as java.lang.Object. Thus, numerical > > comparisons can't be performed until the Objects are cast into > > appropriate types. > > > > > > Sounds like a natural for optimization, no? > > Dick > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
