Sure there are things that can benefit from optimization, but trying to optimize this case doesn't really help anyone. Remember, what is slow here is not the loop itself; it is the casting overhead. However, optimizing casting just isn't going to help unless you have extremely long loops. If you do, then it begs the question why.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:43 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: FW: Jsp Vs Cfm (CFMX) -- Test Code > > Aw, c'mon Matt, that's not the point, and you know it! > > There are certain things that can benefit from optimization, frequently > executed loops or other iterative processes are prime targets. > > You can do just so much with best practices. > > Coding time-sensitive routines in Java or JSP may not be an option for > everyone. > > But the CFMX compiler could do better, especially where it will have > the greatest impact. > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 11:11 AM, Matt Liotta wrote: > > > Sure, but it doesn't seem like optimizing this specific case is really > > going to help anyone in the real world. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
