> Wasn't the original conversation about apps migrating from CF 5 and people > having problems with the upgrade? ... If you have apps that started on CF > MX > then that's another story, but again, I'd say that if problems with MX are > a > major issue for you now ( i.e. they're costing you money you can't afford > to > lose ) then chances are you placed to strong an importance on the new > technology too early after its initial public release... <wagging finger > /> > :) > The conversation was simply about problems with JDBC and CFMX. Suggesting the use of CF 5 instead is wonderful, but it doesn't help anyone who is using the latest greatest platform from Macromedia.
> This may sound harsh, but I think if you can't afford the issues that > come > with being on "the bleeding edge", you should wait and let people who can > afford it weed out those issues. As with all things, let the buyer beware > -- > it's not the merchant's fault if you're not cautious in your development. > That is such utter bullshit. CFMX is not the bleeding edge; it is currently the recommended platform for CFML. Macromedia has done everything short of stopping the supply of CF 5 at this point trying to get people on CFMX. -Matt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
