C , MATLAB, Octave, or any language with a C extension added on. swig
works

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Rob Rohan wrote:

> > however they will mostly be real-time calcs,
> > dealing with potentially large datasets (10's of thousands) so speed and
> > scalability are important factors,
>
> Good point - I really don't know enough about what you are doing to say for
> sure, but I can tell you that we do some hard core real-time calcualtions
> with Java in CF5 and MX and are very pleased with the results.
>
> Good luck,
> Rob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:21 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Wondering about good languages for financial math
> processing
>
>
> >> I've heard that Java isn't really suited for mathematical work either
> >
> >I would beg to differ on that, but it does depends on what you are doing.
> >There is no doubt that C/C++ is faster, and you can do things like embed
> >assembly to get even faster; however, business calculations are rarely that
> >complicated.
> >
> >I am a big proponent for Java for several reasons, I wont bother you with
> >all of them but here are a few:
> >     1. Integrates well with CF
> >             1.5 CF uses JDBC java can use JDBC...
> >     2. You don't have to handle memory stuff as much
> >     3. It's a bit easier to learn than C++
> >     4. I like coffee.
>
> Thanks Rob. Like I say, it was only a student who told me about Java's
> supposed unsuitability. I gotta admit that I'd rather invest time learning
> Java as opposed to C++ for the very reason that Java skills are maybe more
> in tune with CF than ever.
>
> I realise that most of the calculations I am using wont be overtly processor
> intensive as standalone calcs, however they will mostly be real-time calcs,
> dealing with potentially large datasets (10's of thousands) so speed and
> scalability are important factors, hence my tendency to look towards C++.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jon roig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:57 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Wondering about good languages for financial math
> processing
>
>
> I don't have a ton of direct experience with this, but anecdotally I've
> heard that perl is quite good it this. (It's used for a ton of genetic
> modeling and that sort of thing). Of course, your mileage may vary... but it
> might be worth checking out a scripting language rather than trying to dig
> into c++.
>
>       -- jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:35 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Wondering about good languages for financial math processing
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the past I've been piggy backing on Excel via COM in order to do some
> calculations as ColdFusion isn't the best of tools for performing
> mathematical routines. Now, this is not ideal either as it requires Excel to
> be installed on the server and takes up valuable processing time.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions as to any good languages suited for
> mathematical processing? Preferably with the ability to connect or extract
> results easily. I've heard that Java isn't really suited for mathematical
> work either [1]. Perhaps C++ would do the job? I want to avoid COM at this
> stage considering:
>
> a) CFMX doesnt work too well with COM now;
> b) COM is becoming an obsolete technology with MS pushing .Net and web
> services instead.
>
> TIA,
> Dave
>
> [1] I was told by a friend studying for his MSc Comp Sci. so I could be
> completely wrong in my presumptions about Java being unsuited for
> mathematical work.
>
>
>
>
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to