> No, no one has *proven* anything.
Yeah Yeah.. we can argue about this all day long!
Not interested in starting another long thread....

Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:06 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFML standardization (was RE: BlueDragon (was RE: How is
> CFMX J2EE implemented?))
>
>
> On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 19:00 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote:
> > Sean... there are alot of instances.. where we need strongly typed
> > language or code... we have proven this before...
>
In fact, other languages manage just
> fine without strong types - which obviously *proves* that strong typing
> is not needed.
>
> Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Reply via email to